Suppr超能文献

先前经验和任务呈现如何调节 6 岁儿童的创新。

How prior experience and task presentation modulate innovation in 6-year-old-children.

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.

Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Apr;180:87-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 9.

Abstract

Low innovation rates have been found with children until 6-8 years of age in tasks that required them to make a tool. Little is known about how prior experience and task presentation influence innovation rates. In the current study, we investigated these aspects in the floating peanut task (FPT), which required children to pour water into a vertical tube to retrieve a peanut. In three experiments, we varied the amount of plants that 6-year-olds (N = 256) watered prior to the task (zero, one, or five plants), who watered the plants (child or experimenter), and the distance and salience of the water source. We expected that prior experience with the water would modulate task performance by either boosting innovation rates (facilitation effect) or reducing them given that children would possibly learn that the water was for watering plants (functional fixedness effect). Our results indicate robustly low innovation rates in 6-year-olds. However, children's performance improved to some extent with increased salience of the water source as well as with an experimenter-given hint. Due to the low innovation rates in this age group, we investigated whether watering plants prior to the FPT would influence innovation rates in 7- and 8-year-olds (N = 33), for which we did not find evidence. We conclude that 6-year-olds struggle with innovation but that they are more likely to innovate if crucial aspects of the task are made more salient. Thus, although 6-year-olds can innovate, they require more physical and social scaffolding than older children and adults.

摘要

在需要儿童制作工具的任务中,直到 6-8 岁,他们的创新率都很低。关于先前经验和任务呈现如何影响创新率,人们知之甚少。在当前的研究中,我们在浮动花生任务(FPT)中研究了这些方面,该任务要求儿童将水倒入垂直管中以取回花生。在三个实验中,我们改变了 6 岁儿童(N=256)在任务前浇水的植物数量(零、一或五株)、浇水的人(儿童或实验者)以及水源的距离和显著性。我们预计,通过提高创新率(促进效应)或降低创新率(功能固定效应),先前的浇水经验会调节任务表现,因为儿童可能会了解到水是用来浇水的。我们的结果表明,6 岁儿童的创新率非常低。然而,随着水源显著性的提高以及实验者的提示,儿童的表现有所提高。由于该年龄段的创新率较低,我们研究了在 FPT 之前浇水是否会影响 7 岁和 8 岁儿童的创新率(N=33),但我们没有发现证据。我们的结论是,6 岁儿童在创新方面存在困难,但如果任务的关键方面更加显著,他们更有可能创新。因此,尽管 6 岁儿童可以创新,但他们比年长的儿童和成人需要更多的身体和社会支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验