Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia; and.
School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Sep;34(9):2654-2662. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002934.
Graham, S, Duthie, G, Aughey, R, and Zois, J. Comparison of physical profiles of state-level netball players by position. J Strength Cond Res 34(9): 2654-2662, 2020-Understanding the physical profiles of state-level netball athletes provides conditioning professionals with testing norms and an understanding of important capacities within particular positions. The purpose was to examine positional differences in physical capacities of state-level netball athletes. Forty-six state-level netball athletes completed physical capacity assessments in the second week of their preseason, over 2 seasons. Tests included stature, 20-m sprint (with 5 and 10 m splits), 505 change-of-direction, countermovement jump, single-leg bounding, and the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level one. A linear mixed-model with fixed and random effects was used in conjunction with magnitude-based inferences to determine meaningful differences with 90% confidence limits (CLs). Midcourt athletes were shorter in stature than shooters (effect size [ES]: 1.26, CL 0.88-1.63) and defenders (-2.58, -3.35 to -1.80). Midcourt athletes were faster than shooters and defenders in linear acceleration over 5 and 10 m distances and 505 change-of-direction (ES range: -0.34 to -0.59). Shooters presented poorer intermittent endurance than midcourt (-0.82, -1.34 to -0.31) and defenders (-0.56, -1.19 to 0.07). Defenders jumped higher than midcourt athletes (-0.56, -1.30 to 0.19) and shooters (-0.61, -1.18 to -0.04), and possessed greater bounding ability compared with shooters (ES range: -0.23 to -0.57). Midcourt athletes require a more holistic set of physical capacities including acceleration, change-of-direction, jumping, and intermittent endurance. For defender and shooter positions, results indicate physical requirements that may be more specific to their positions. Conditioning professionals can use these findings to target specific physical qualities to maximize position-specific performance.
格雷厄姆、萨瑟恩、奥格、里德和佐伊斯。位置对国家级无挡板篮球运动员身体特征的比较。《力量与调节研究杂志》34(9):2654-2662,2020 年——了解国家级无挡板篮球运动员的身体特征可为体能训练专业人员提供测试标准,并了解特定位置的重要能力。本研究旨在检验国家级无挡板篮球运动员身体能力的位置差异。46 名国家级无挡板篮球运动员在两个赛季的季前赛第二周完成了体能能力评估。测试包括身高、20 米冲刺(包括 5 米和 10 米分段)、505 变向能力、反跳、单腿纵跳和 Yo-Yo 间歇性恢复测试 1 级。使用带有固定和随机效应的线性混合模型以及基于幅度的推断来确定具有 90%置信区间(CL)的有意义差异。中场运动员的身高比投手(效应量 [ES]:1.26,CL 0.88-1.63)和防守者(-2.58,-3.35 至-1.80)更矮。中场运动员在 5 米和 10 米以及 505 变向的线性加速度方面比投手和防守者更快(ES 范围:-0.34 至-0.59)。投手的间歇性耐力比中场(-0.82,-1.34 至-0.31)和防守者(-0.56,-1.19 至 0.07)差。防守者比中场运动员跳得更高(-0.56,-1.30 至-0.19)和投手(-0.61,-1.18 至-0.04),并且与投手相比具有更大的跳跃能力(ES 范围:-0.23 至-0.57)。中场运动员需要更全面的身体素质,包括加速度、变向能力、跳跃和间歇性耐力。对于防守者和投手位置,结果表明对身体素质的要求可能更针对其位置。体能训练专业人员可以利用这些发现针对特定的身体素质,以最大限度地提高特定位置的表现。