Heart Valve Surgery Department, Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Heart Valve Surgery Department, Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Autumn;31(3):424-431. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
Surgical septal myectomy is a standard treatment option for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Subvalvular abnormalities of the mitral valve might play an important role in residual left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. This randomized study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of septal myectomy with vs without subvalvular interventions. Between July 2015 and December 2016, 80 eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo septal myectomy with vs without subvalvular intervention. The peak gradient was 92.3 ± 16.9 and 88.1 ± 15.4 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.281). The mean septum thickness was 26.8 ± 4.5 and 26.1 ± 4.2 mm, respectively (P = 0.504). Moderate or severe systolic anterior motion syndrome-mediated mitral regurgitation was observed in all patients. There was no residual mitral regurgitation in the group with subvalvular intervention, while 15% of patients in the control group had regurgitation (P = 0.013). Residual systolic anterior motion syndrome was observed in 5% and 27.5% of patients, respectively (P = 0.007). The median postoperative gradient was 13 (interquartile range 9-16) mm Hg and 8 (interquartile range 4-12) mm Hg, respectively (P = 0. 0.019). At the 12-month follow-up, all patients were alive. There were 87.5% vs 77.5%, and 12.5% vs 22.5% of patients categorized as having New York Heart Association functional classes I and II, respectively (P = 0.378). The prevalence rate of residual mitral regurgitation was 10% and 32.5%, respectively (P = 0.010). Concomitant subvalvular intervention during septal myectomy more effectively eliminates left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, providing better freedom from residual mitral regurgitation without clinical benefit 1 year after surgery.
外科室间隔心肌切除术是肥厚型梗阻性心肌病患者的标准治疗选择。二尖瓣瓣下异常在残留的左心室流出道梗阻中可能起着重要作用。这项随机研究旨在比较室间隔心肌切除术伴或不伴瓣下干预的手术结果。2015 年 7 月至 2016 年 12 月,80 名符合条件的患者被随机分为接受室间隔心肌切除术伴或不伴瓣下干预。峰值梯度分别为 92.3 ± 16.9 和 88.1 ± 15.4 mmHg(P = 0.281)。室间隔厚度分别为 26.8 ± 4.5 和 26.1 ± 4.2 mm(P = 0.504)。所有患者均有中度或重度收缩期前向运动综合征介导的二尖瓣反流。瓣下干预组无残留二尖瓣反流,而对照组中有 15%的患者有反流(P = 0.013)。残留收缩期前向运动综合征分别在 5%和 27.5%的患者中观察到(P = 0.007)。术后中位梯度分别为 13(四分位距 9-16)mmHg 和 8(四分位距 4-12)mmHg(P = 0.019)。在 12 个月的随访中,所有患者均存活。纽约心脏协会功能分级 I 和 II 的患者分别为 87.5%和 77.5%,12.5%和 22.5%(P = 0.378)。残留二尖瓣反流的发生率分别为 10%和 32.5%(P = 0.010)。室间隔心肌切除术同时行瓣下干预更有效地消除左心室流出道梗阻,术后 1 年无残留二尖瓣反流的发生率更高,但无临床获益。