Nininger Jami M, Abbott Miriam R B, Shaw Peggy
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2019 Jan 1;50(1):15-19. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20190102-05.
To improve the quality of patient care, the Institute of Medicine has called for eliminating barriers to academic progression for nurses. Despite this call, nurses who matriculate from institutions that lack national nursing-specific accreditation are denied admission to advanced degree programs.
Within an online RN-to-baccalaureate nursing (BSN) program, the performance of students who matriculated from institutions lacking discipline-specific accreditation was compared with student performance representative of programs holding discipline-specific accreditation. The bases for comparison were grade point average (GPA), on-time completion rate, and academic withdrawal.
Students admitted from institutions lacking national nursing accreditation had a higher on-time completion rate and a lower GPA than comparison groups. Differences in GPA were statistically insignificant (p > .05). Evidence regarding withdrawals was insufficient for adequate comparisons.
Admission policies that deny education opportunities to candidates from institutions lacking national nursing accreditation may create unwarranted barriers to educational advancement. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2019;50(1):15-19.].
为提高患者护理质量,美国医学研究所呼吁消除阻碍护士学术进步的障碍。尽管有此呼吁,但从缺乏全国护理专业认证机构毕业的护士被拒绝进入高级学位项目。
在一个在线注册护士到护理学学士学位(BSN)项目中,将从缺乏专业认证机构毕业的学生表现与代表拥有专业认证项目的学生表现进行比较。比较的依据是平均绩点(GPA)、按时完成率和学术退学情况。
从缺乏全国护理认证机构录取的学生比对照组有更高的按时完成率和更低的GPA。GPA差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。关于退学的证据不足以进行充分比较。
拒绝来自缺乏全国护理认证机构的候选人教育机会的录取政策可能会对教育进步造成不必要的障碍。[《护理学继续教育杂志》。2019年;50(1):15 - 19。]