Suppr超能文献

血浆中活性纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1(PAI-1)特异性检测的标准与研究

Criteria and Search for Specific Assays for Active Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) in Plasma.

作者信息

Kluft C

机构信息

Gaubius Laboratory, TNO-PG P.O. Box 2215 2301 CE Leiden The Netherlands E-Mail:

出版信息

EJIFCC. 2000 May 1;12(2):46-55. eCollection 2000 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proficiency testing of enzymatic methods for plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) showed a systematic variability indicating the aspecificity of some methods.

METHODS

To define and detect specificity of enzymatic methods for PAI-1, experts of the ISTH/SSC subcommittee defined criteria and test samples to check the criteria. 16 samples were prepared to test (a) specificity in depleted plasma, (b) interference by added PAI-2 or PAI-3, (c) interference by added tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), (d) performance in dose response. To exercise the test procedure participants were recruited via the subcommittee, literature and company data. Coded samples were distributed to participants. The NIBSC standard for PAI-1 activity was included for the normalisation of results. Adherence to the predetermined criteria was judged blind in the ISTH/SSC subcommittee meeting.

RESULTS

In total 17 laboratories with 15 different assay methods participated in the study. Methods were based on four detection principles. 8 methods failed to detect sufficiently low activity in depleted plasma and were sensitive to added PAI-2. 10 methods were sensitive to interference by endogenous t-PA as revealed by additions of t-PA. Not all methods could adequately measure in acidified plasma. Two methods were fulfilling all the criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Most methods were not specific for PAI-1 (enz. procedure) in acidified plasma. Definition of criteria and test methods by experts of the ISTH/SSC proved a valuable concept, according to the exercise undertaken.

摘要

背景

纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1(PAI-1)酶法的能力验证显示出系统变异性,表明某些方法存在非特异性。

方法

为了定义和检测PAI-1酶法的特异性,国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)/标准化委员会(SSC)小组委员会的专家定义了标准和测试样品以检验这些标准。制备了16个样品来测试:(a)在贫血浆中的特异性;(b)添加PAI-2或PAI-3的干扰;(c)添加组织型纤溶酶原激活物(t-PA)的干扰;(d)剂量反应性能。通过小组委员会、文献和公司数据招募参与者来实施测试程序。将编码后的样品分发给参与者。结果标准化纳入了PAI-1活性的英国国家生物标准与控制研究所(NIBSC)标准。在ISTH/SSC小组委员会会议上,对是否符合预定标准进行了盲法判断。

结果

共有17个实验室采用15种不同的检测方法参与了该研究。这些方法基于四种检测原理。8种方法未能检测到贫血浆中足够低的活性,并且对添加的PAI-2敏感。添加t-PA显示,10种方法对内源性t-PA的干扰敏感。并非所有方法都能在酸化血浆中进行充分测量。两种方法符合所有标准。

结论

在酸化血浆中,大多数方法对PAI-1(酶法)不具有特异性。根据所进行的实践,ISTH/SSC专家定义的标准和测试方法证明是一个有价值的概念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/928e/6327147/97e55719d44b/ejifcc-12-046-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验