Suppr超能文献

采用传统血管造影术评估股动脉分叉水平

Assessment of Femoral Artery Bifurcation Level with Conventional Angiography.

作者信息

Mengal Muhammad N, Ashraf Tariq, Hassan Rizvi Syed N, Badini Abida, Karim Musa

机构信息

Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK.

Family Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):e3479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3479.

Abstract

Introduction The common femoral artery (CFA) is the optimal access point for femoral arterial puncture. A higher or lower puncture can result in various vascular complications and by the proper definition of the femoral arterial bifurcation level and the optimal puncture point such complications can potentially be avoided. In the literature, little data is available about the frequency of femoral artery bifurcation and the relationship between the bifurcation level of one artery and its contralateral counterpart in our part of the world. Methods We performed a prospective study from April 2016 to September 2016 to define the frequency of bifurcation of the CFA in relation to the femoral head and the relationship between bilateral CFA bifurcations, with bilateral femoral angiography on 579 patients undergoing routine coronary angiography. Results The frequency of normal/low, high, and very high femoral bifurcations was 66%, 26%, and 8%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the bifurcation of CFA between the two sides (p = 0.51). A specific bifurcation level on one side significantly increased the likelihood of the same bifurcation level on the contralateral side (odds ratio (OR) = 151.86 (51.39-448.77)). A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed age, race, gender, height and weight, body surface area (BSA), and body mass index (BMI) were not predictive of any specific bifurcation level on either side. Conclusions The majority (two-thirds) of the individuals in the study population were with normal/low femoral bifurcation with no significant difference in bifurcation level on either side.

摘要

引言 股总动脉(CFA)是股动脉穿刺的最佳入路点。较高或较低的穿刺可能导致各种血管并发症,通过正确定义股动脉分叉水平和最佳穿刺点,有可能避免此类并发症。在文献中,关于我们所在地区股动脉分叉的频率以及一侧动脉与对侧动脉分叉水平之间的关系,可用数据很少。方法 我们于2016年4月至2016年9月进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定股总动脉相对于股骨头的分叉频率以及双侧股总动脉分叉之间的关系,对579例行常规冠状动脉造影的患者进行双侧股动脉造影。结果 正常/低位、高位和极高位股动脉分叉的频率分别为66%、26%和8%。两侧股总动脉分叉无显著差异(p = 0.51)。一侧的特定分叉水平显著增加了对侧相同分叉水平的可能性(优势比(OR)= 151.86(51.39 - 448.77))。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、种族、性别、身高和体重、体表面积(BSA)和体重指数(BMI)均不能预测两侧的任何特定分叉水平。结论 研究人群中的大多数(三分之二)个体为正常/低位股动脉分叉,两侧分叉水平无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验