Suppr超能文献

2016-2017 年英格兰流感疫苗加强被动监测——使用不良事件报告卡的观察性研究。

Enhanced passive surveillance of influenza vaccination in England, 2016-2017- an observational study using an adverse events reporting card.

机构信息

a Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine , University of Surrey , Guildford , UK.

b Biostatistics EPI , GSK , Wavre , Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1048-1059. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1565258. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Abstract

Influenza is a major public health burden, mainly prevented by vaccination. Recommendations on influenza vaccine composition are updated annually and constant benefit-risk monitoring is therefore needed. We conducted near-real-time enhanced passive surveillance (EPS) for the influenza vaccine, Fluarix Tetra, according to European Medicines Agency guidance, in 10 volunteer general practices in England using Fluarix Tetra as their principal influenza vaccine brand, from 1-Sep to 30-Nov-2016. The EPS method used a combination of routinely collected data from electronic health records (EHR) and a customized adverse events reporting card (AERC) distributed to participants vaccinated with Fluarix Tetra. For participants vaccinated with a different influenza vaccine, data were derived exclusively from the EHR. We reported weekly and cumulative incidence of pre-defined adverse events of interest (AEI) occurring within 7 days post-vaccination, adjusted for clustering effect. Of the 97,754 eligible participants, 19,334 (19.8%) received influenza vaccination, of whom 13,861 (71.7%) received Fluarix Tetra. A total of 1,049 participants receiving Fluarix Tetra reported AEIs; 703 (67%) used the AERC (adjusted cumulative incidence rate 4.96% [95% CI: 3.92-6.25]). Analysis by individual pre-specified AEI categories identified no safety signal for Fluarix Tetra. A total of 62 individuals reported an AEI with a known brand of non-GSK influenza vaccine and 54 with an unknown brand (adjusted cumulative incidence rate 2.59% [1.93-3.47] and 1.77% [1.42-2.20], respectively). In conclusion, the study identified no safety signal for Fluarix Tetra and showed that the AERC was a useful tool that complemented routine pharmacovigilance by allowing more comprehensive capture of AEIs.

摘要

流感是一个主要的公共卫生负担,主要通过疫苗接种来预防。因此,需要每年更新流感疫苗成分的建议,并对其进行持续的效益-风险监测。我们根据欧洲药品管理局的指导,在英格兰的 10 家志愿普通实践中,使用 Fluarix Tetra 作为主要的流感疫苗品牌,从 2016 年 9 月 1 日至 11 月 30 日,进行了针对流感疫苗 Fluarix Tetra 的近乎实时的强化被动监测(EPS)。EPS 方法结合了电子健康记录(EHR)中常规收集的数据和分发给接种 Fluarix Tetra 的参与者的定制不良事件报告卡(AERC)。对于接种不同流感疫苗的参与者,数据完全来自 EHR。我们报告了接种疫苗后 7 天内发生的预先定义的不良事件(AEI)的每周和累积发生率,调整了聚类效应。在 97754 名合格的参与者中,有 19334 名(19.8%)接受了流感疫苗接种,其中 13861 名(71.7%)接种了 Fluarix Tetra。共有 1049 名接受 Fluarix Tetra 的参与者报告了 AEI;703 名(67%)使用了 AERC(调整后的累积发病率为 4.96%[95%CI:3.92-6.25])。对个体预先指定的 AEI 类别进行分析,未发现 Fluarix Tetra 的安全信号。共有 62 人报告了与非 GSK 流感疫苗已知品牌相关的 AEI,54 人报告了未知品牌的 AEI(调整后的累积发病率分别为 2.59%[1.93-3.47]和 1.77%[1.42-2.20])。总之,该研究未发现 Fluarix Tetra 的安全信号,并表明 AERC 是一种有用的工具,通过更全面地捕捉 AEI,补充了常规药物警戒。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf6a/6605873/42c90f7b7fe9/khvi-15-05-1565258-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验