Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Mar 1;155(3):321-326. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5057.
Surgeons have varying opinions on the ideal cutaneous suture spacing for optimal cosmetic outcomes. To date, no studies concerning the effect of suture spacing on cosmetic outcomes exist in the literature.
To compare outcomes and wound cosmesis achieved with running cutaneous sutures spaced 2 vs 5 mm apart.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the University of California, Davis dermatology clinic from November 28, 2017, to June 15, 2018. Fifty-six patients 18 years or older with surgical fusiform wounds (from Mohs procedure or surgical excision) on the head or neck with assumed closure lengths of at least 3 cm were screened. Six patients were excluded, 50 patients were enrolled, and 48 patients were followed up.
Fifty surgical fusiform wounds were randomized to running cuticular closure with 2-mm spacing on half and 5-mm spacing on half.
At 3 months, patients and 2 masked observers evaluated each scar using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
A total of 50 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [11.4] years; 43 [86%] male; 50 [100%] white) were enrolled in the study. The mean (SD) sum of the POSAS observer component scores was 10.7 (4.3) for the 2-mm interval side and 10.8 (3.5) for the 5-mm side at 3 months (P = .77). No statistically significant difference was found in the mean (SD) sum of the patient component for the POSAS score between the 2-mm interval side (10.2 [4.7]) and the 5-mm interval side (11.5 [6.4]) at 3 months (P = .24). No statistically significant difference was observed in mean (SD) scar width between the 2-mm side (0.9 [0.6] mm) and the 5-mm side (0.8 [0.4] mm; P = .15).
No statistically significant difference in wound cosmesis or total complications were noted between running cuticular sutures spaced 2 vs 5 mm apart. Both suturing techniques resulted in similar cosmetic outcomes and complication rates. Surgeons may want to consider whether the extra time involved in placing very closely spaced cuticular sutures is worthwhile.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03330041.
外科医生对于实现最佳美容效果的理想皮肤缝合间距存在不同意见。迄今为止,文献中尚无关于缝合间距对美容效果影响的研究。
比较 2 毫米和 5 毫米间距的连续皮缝线对美容效果的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验于 2017 年 11 月 28 日至 2018 年 6 月 15 日在加利福尼亚大学戴维斯皮肤科诊所进行。筛选了 56 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的头颈部接受过梭形手术(Mohs 手术或外科切除)的患者,预计伤口长度至少为 3 厘米。有 6 名患者被排除,50 名患者入组,48 名患者接受了随访。
50 个外科梭形伤口随机分为 2 毫米间距和 5 毫米间距的连续皮缝线。
术后 3 个月,患者和 2 名盲法观察者使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)评估每个疤痕。
共有 50 名患者(平均年龄[标准差],71.1[11.4]岁;43[86%]为男性;50[100%]为白人)入组研究。3 个月时,2 毫米间隔侧的 POSAS 观察者评分总和(10.7[4.3])和 5 毫米间隔侧的总和(10.8[3.5])(P=0.77)。3 个月时,2 毫米间隔侧(10.2[4.7])和 5 毫米间隔侧(11.5[6.4])POSAS 评分的患者评分总和的平均(标准差)差异无统计学意义(P=0.24)。3 个月时,2 毫米侧(0.9[0.6]毫米)和 5 毫米侧(0.8[0.4]毫米)的平均(标准差)疤痕宽度差异无统计学意义(P=0.15)。
2 毫米和 5 毫米间距的连续皮缝线在伤口美容效果或总并发症方面无统计学差异。两种缝线技术均产生相似的美容效果和并发症发生率。外科医生可能需要考虑在非常接近的皮缝线之间是否值得花费额外的时间。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03330041。