Edwards G, Breckenridge A M
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, England.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988 Aug;15(2):67-93. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198815020-00001.
A rational strategy for chemotherapy demands that dosage schedules be based on an adequate knowledge of clinical and biochemical pharmacology. Many anthelmintic drugs (e.g. suramin, diethylcarbamazine, hycanthone) were introduced before modern techniques for drug evaluation (controlled clinical trials) and before the development of specific and sensitive analytical methods for the assay of drugs and metabolites in biological fluids. Thus, many of the regimens used today for the treatment of parasitic diseases are largely empirically derived. By means of specific analytical methodology (high performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography and mass-spectrometry) introduced in the 1960s, it is now possible to measure drugs and their metabolites with specificity and sensitivity. Much of this review deals with compounds which are active against the major systemic helminths, i.e., filariae (diethylcarbamazine, ivermectin and suramin) and schistosomes (niridazole, metrifonate, oxamniquine and praziquantel), but recent advances in the treatment of hydatid disease involving the benzimidazole carbamates albendazole and mebendazole are also discussed. Among the imidazole derivatives, mebendazole, a broad-spectrum anthelmintic, is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after a therapeutic dose, but that fraction which is absorbed and escapes hepatic first-pass extraction is pharmacologically active against systemic helminths. Albendazole is more completely absorbed, but is almost undetectable in plasma due to its rapid conversion to an active sulphoxide metabolite. This compound may well become the drug of choice for the chemotherapy of echinococcosis. Levamisole, the 1-isomer of tetramisole, is rapidly and completely absorbed, but has not been widely used in systemic helminthiases because of severe side effects associated with prolonged dosage. Diethylcarbamazine is microfilaricidal against Onchocerca volvulus, but its use has been associated with major adverse effects resulting from its action on the microfilariae. These effects are related to the concentration of the drug in the plasma which, in turn, is influenced by urinary pH. The elimination half-life of diethylcarbamazine is prolonged and renal clearance reduced in alkaline urine. Under these conditions the microfilaricidal effect is enhanced, but the adverse reactions to treatment are more severe. Suramin is the only available antifilarial agent with macrofilaricidal activity. It has a long elimination half-life (36 to 54 days), and is highly (99.7%) bound to plasma protein which limits its removal from the blood.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
合理的化疗策略要求给药方案应基于对临床和生化药理学的充分了解。许多驱虫药(如苏拉明、乙胺嗪、海恩酮)在现代药物评估技术(对照临床试验)出现之前,以及在用于生物体液中药物和代谢物分析的特异性和灵敏性分析方法开发之前就已问世。因此,如今用于治疗寄生虫病的许多方案很大程度上是经验性的。借助于20世纪60年代引入的特异性分析方法(高效液相色谱法、气相色谱法和质谱分析法),现在能够特异性且灵敏地测定药物及其代谢物。本综述大部分内容涉及对主要全身性蠕虫有活性的化合物,即丝虫(乙胺嗪、伊维菌素和苏拉明)和血吸虫(硝唑咪、敌百虫、奥沙尼喹和吡喹酮),但也讨论了涉及苯并咪唑氨基甲酸盐类阿苯达唑和甲苯达唑治疗包虫病的最新进展。在咪唑衍生物中,甲苯达唑是一种广谱驱虫药,治疗剂量后从胃肠道吸收较差,但吸收并逃过肝脏首过消除的部分对全身性蠕虫具有药理活性。阿苯达唑吸收更完全,但由于其迅速转化为活性亚砜代谢物,在血浆中几乎检测不到。这种化合物很可能成为棘球蚴病化疗的首选药物。左旋咪唑是四咪唑的1 - 异构体,吸收迅速且完全,但由于长期给药会产生严重副作用,尚未广泛用于全身性蠕虫病。乙胺嗪对盘尾丝虫有杀微丝蚴作用,但其使用与对微丝蚴作用产生的主要不良反应有关。这些作用与血浆中药物浓度有关,而血浆中药物浓度又受尿液pH值影响。在碱性尿液中,乙胺嗪的消除半衰期延长,肾清除率降低。在这些情况下,杀微丝蚴作用增强,但治疗的不良反应更严重。苏拉明是唯一可用的具有杀成虫活性的抗丝虫药。它的消除半衰期很长(36至54天),并且与血浆蛋白高度结合(99.7%),这限制了它从血液中的清除。(摘要截选至400字)