Center for Marine Environmental Studies (CMES) , Ehime University , Bunkyo-cho 2-5 , Matsuyama 790-8577 , Japan.
Graduate School of Agriculture , Ehime University , 3-5-7 Tarumi , Matsuyama 790-8566 , Japan.
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 19;53(4):2181-2188. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07273. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
In this study, we assessed the binding affinities of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), including perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFSAs), to the ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of Baikal seal ( Pusa sibirica; bs) and human (h) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). An in vitro competitive binding assay showed that six PFCAs and two PFSAs could bind to recombinant bs and hPPARα LBD proteins in a dose-dependent manner. The relative binding affinities (RBAs) of PFASs to bsPPARα were as follows: PFOS > PFDA > PFNA > PFUnDA > PFOA > PFHxS > PFHpA > PFHxA. The RBAs to bsPPARα showed a significant positive correlation with those to hPPARα. In silico PPARα homology modeling predicted that there were two ligand-binding pockets (LBPs) in the bsPPARα and hPPARα LBDs. Structure-activity relationship analyses suggested that the binding potencies of PFASs to PPARα might depend on LBP binding cavity volume, hydrogen bond interactions, the number of perfluorinated carbons, and the hydrophobicity of PFASs. Interspecies comparison of the in vitro binding affinities revealed that bsPPARα had higher preference for PFASs with long carbon chains than hPPARα. The in silico docking simulations suggested that the first LBP of bsPPARα had higher affinities than that of hPPARα; however, the second LBP of bsPPARα had lower affinities than that of hPPARα. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence showing interspecies differences in the binding of PFASs to PPARαs and their structure-activity relationships.
在这项研究中,我们评估了全氟烷基物质(PFASs),包括全氟烷基羧酸(PFCAs)和全氟烷基磺酸盐(PFSAs),与贝加尔海豹(Pusa sibirica;bs)和人类(h)过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α(PPARα)的配体结合域(LBD)的结合亲和力。体外竞争性结合测定表明,六种 PFCAs 和两种 PFSAs 可以以剂量依赖的方式与重组 bs 和 hPPARα LBD 蛋白结合。PFASs 与 bsPPARα 的相对结合亲和力(RBA)如下:PFOS > PFDA > PFNA > PFUnDA > PFOA > PFHxS > PFHpA > PFHxA。bsPPARα 与 bsPPARα 的 RBA 呈显著正相关。PPARα 同源建模预测 bsPPARα 和 hPPARα LBD 中有两个配体结合口袋(LBP)。结构-活性关系分析表明,PFASs 与 PPARα 的结合能力可能取决于 LBP 结合腔体积、氢键相互作用、全氟化碳原子数和 PFASs 的疏水性。体外结合亲和力的种间比较表明,bsPPARα 对长链 PFASs 的偏好高于 hPPARα。计算机对接模拟表明,bsPPARα 的第一个 LBP 比 hPPARα 具有更高的亲和力;然而,bsPPARα 的第二个 LBP 比 hPPARα 具有更低的亲和力。据我们所知,这是首次证明 PFASs 与 PPARα 结合的种间差异及其结构-活性关系的证据。