Iftode Cristian
a Department of Practical Philosophy and History of Philosophy , University of Bucharest , Bucharest , Romania.
New Bioeth. 2019 Mar;25(1):24-38. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2019.1565472. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
This paper argues for a revised concept of authenticity entailing two demands that must be balanced. The first demand moves authenticity from the position of a strictly self-regarding virtue towards the position of a fully social virtue, acknowledging the crucial feature of steadiness, i.e. self-consistency, as being precisely what we 'naturally' lack (Williams). Nevertheless, the value of personal authenticity in a modern, open society comes from the fact that it brings about not only steadiness, but also the public development of a variety of existential options that can be understood as Millian 'original experiments in living'. Thus the second demand of authenticity is a demand for 'experimental' authenticity which covers the whole spectrum of technologies of the self, from Nietzschean 'brief habits', to the use of enhancement technologies.
本文主张对本真性的概念进行修正,这需要平衡两个要求。第一个要求是将本真性从一种严格的自我关注的美德的立场,转变为一种完全社会性的美德的立场,承认稳定性这一关键特征,即自我一致性,恰恰是我们“天然”缺乏的(威廉姆斯)。然而,在现代开放社会中,个人本真性的价值源于这样一个事实,即它不仅带来稳定性,还带来各种存在选项的公共发展,这些选项可被理解为密尔式的“生活的原创实验”。因此,本真性的第二个要求是对“实验性”本真性的要求,它涵盖了自我技术的整个范围,从尼采式的“简短习惯”到增强技术的使用。