Department of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Internal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Mar;119(3):461-466. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676983. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
The double-blind, randomized, AMPLIFY trial compared 6 months' treatment with apixaban (10 mg twice daily for 7 days and 5 mg twice daily thereafter) versus conventional treatment (subcutaneous enoxaparin [1 mg/kg twice daily for ≥ 5 days] overlapped and followed by warfarin [international normalized ratio = 2.0-3.0]) in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). This post hoc analysis of AMPLIFY compared outcomes among those taking or not taking concomitant anti-platelet therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE or VTE-related death; the principal safety outcome was major bleeding. Of 5,365 (apixaban, = 2,676; enoxaparin/warfarin, = 2,689) randomized patients, 813 (apixaban, = 402 [15%]; enoxaparin/warfarin, = 411 [15%]) took concomitant anti-platelet therapy, of which 92% consisted of low-dose aspirin. Rates of VTE or VTE-related death were similar whether or not anti-platelet agents were taken (apixaban: 3.6 and 2.0%; enoxaparin/warfarin: 3.0 and 2.6%; anti-platelet use: relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-2.62; no anti-platelet use: RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.52-1.13); interaction -value = 0.299. Major bleeding rates were threefold higher in those taking versus those not taking anti-platelet agents (apixaban: 1.2 and 0.4%; enoxaparin/warfarin: 4.1 and 1.4%; anti-platelet use: RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.81; no anti-platelet use: RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.63); interaction -value = 0.924. Concomitant anti-platelet therapy produced a proportionally similar increase in major bleeding in patients randomized to apixaban or conventional therapy, but there were fewer major bleeds with apixaban. Therefore, the overall safety of apixaban over conventional therapy was maintained in patients receiving anti-platelet therapy. NCT00643201.
在急性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者中,双盲、随机、AMPLIFY 试验比较了 6 个月的阿哌沙班(前 7 天每日两次 10mg,之后每日两次 5mg)治疗与传统治疗(皮下依诺肝素[1mg/kg,每日两次,至少 5 天]重叠,随后华法林[国际标准化比值 2.0-3.0])。AMPLIFY 的这一事后分析比较了接受或不接受同时抗血小板治疗的患者的结局。主要疗效结局是复发性 VTE 或 VTE 相关死亡;主要安全性结局是大出血。在 5365 名(阿哌沙班, = 2676;依诺肝素/华法林, = 2689)随机患者中,813 名(阿哌沙班, = 402 [15%];依诺肝素/华法林, = 411 [15%])接受了同时抗血小板治疗,其中 92%由低剂量阿司匹林组成。无论是否使用抗血小板药物,VTE 或 VTE 相关死亡的发生率相似(阿哌沙班:3.6%和 2.0%;依诺肝素/华法林:3.0%和 2.6%;抗血小板药物使用:相对风险 [RR],1.23;95%置信区间 [CI],0.58-2.62;未使用抗血小板药物:RR,0.77;95% CI,0.52-1.13);交互 - 值 = 0.299。与未使用抗血小板药物相比,使用抗血小板药物的大出血发生率高三倍(阿哌沙班:1.2%和 0.4%;依诺肝素/华法林:4.1%和 1.4%;抗血小板药物使用:RR,0.30;95% CI,0.11-0.81;未使用抗血小板药物:RR,0.31;95% CI,0.15-0.63);交互 - 值 = 0.924。在随机接受阿哌沙班或常规治疗的患者中,同时使用抗血小板药物会导致大出血发生率呈比例增加,但阿哌沙班的大出血减少。因此,在接受抗血小板治疗的患者中,阿哌沙班相对于常规治疗的总体安全性得到维持。NCT00643201。