• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用血清S100-β蛋白作为生物标志物,比较颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术中的无症状脑损伤。

Using serum s100-β protein as a biomarker for comparing silent brain injury in carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

作者信息

Alserr Ayman H, Elwan Hussein, Antonopoulos Constantine N, Abdelreheem Amr, Elmahdy Hossam, Sayed Ahmed, Taha Ahmed, Maratou Eirini, Brountzos Elias, Khairy Hussein, Liapis Christos D

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece -

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Cairo University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt -

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2019 Apr;38(2):136-142. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04079-3. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04079-3
PMID:30650951
Abstract

BACKGROUND

S100-β protein has been introduced as a sensitive biomarker of silent cerebral injury. This study compares its serum levels before, during, and 24 hours after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

We measured serum level of S100-β in arterial blood before (S100Ba), during (S100Bb), and 24 hours after (S100Bc) CAS and CEA. We assessed differences in S100-β levels using non-parametric tests. We analyzed the relationship between carotid plaque type (echolucency) and S100-β protein level. We also examined its relation to the oximetry results in the CEA group (ipsilateral and contralateral).

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled, including 15 CAS and 15 CEA patients, with no significant differences in baseline atherosclerotic characteristics. There was no significant difference in S100Ba or S100Bb levels between CAS and CEA patients. However, a significant difference was found in S100Bc: 331.3 pg/mL (IQ range 56.4-583.5) for CAS vs. 76.3 pg/mL (IQ range 29.7-117.4) for CEA (P=0.01). Type I and II plaques were associated with the higher S100Bc levels in CAS (P=0.048). S100Bc was higher in CEA patients when the contralateral cerebral hemisphere had oximetry values less than 60% (P=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that CAS might produce silent brain injury. Moreover, vulnerable plaques might be associated with higher levels of S100-β protein, especially in CAS. This pilot study demonstrates that S100-β is a useful biomarker for silent brain injury in carotid revascularization. Large scale studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

S100-β蛋白已被作为无症状性脑损伤的一种敏感生物标志物。本研究比较了颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)前、术中及术后24小时血清S100-β蛋白水平。

方法

我们测量了CAS和CEA术前(S100Ba)、术中(S100Bb)及术后24小时(S100Bc)动脉血中S100-β的血清水平。我们使用非参数检验评估S100-β水平的差异。我们分析了颈动脉斑块类型(回声)与S100-β蛋白水平之间的关系。我们还在CEA组中检查了其与血氧饱和度结果(同侧和对侧)的关系。

结果

共纳入30例患者,其中15例行CAS,15例行CEA,基线动脉粥样硬化特征无显著差异。CAS组和CEA组患者的S100Ba或S100Bb水平无显著差异。然而,S100Bc存在显著差异:CAS组为331.3 pg/mL(四分位间距56.4 - 583.5),CEA组为76.3 pg/mL(四分位间距2)9.7 - 117.4)(P = 0.01)。I型和II型斑块与CAS组较高的S100Bc水平相关(P = 0.048)。当对侧脑半球血氧饱和度值低于60%时,CEA患者的S100Bc更高(P = 0.043)。

结论

我们的研究表明,CAS可能会导致无症状性脑损伤。此外,易损斑块可能与较高水平的S100-β蛋白相关,尤其是在CAS中。这项初步研究表明,S100-β是颈动脉血运重建术中无症状性脑损伤的一种有用生物标志物。仍需大规模研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Using serum s100-β protein as a biomarker for comparing silent brain injury in carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.使用血清S100-β蛋白作为生物标志物,比较颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术中的无症状脑损伤。
Int Angiol. 2019 Apr;38(2):136-142. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04079-3. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Comparative study on carotid revascularization (endarterectomy vs stenting) using markers of cellular brain injury, neuropsychometric tests, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.颈动脉血运重建(内膜切除术与支架置入术)的细胞性脑损伤标志物、神经心理测试和弥散加权磁共振成像的对比研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):584-91, 591.e1-3; discussion 592. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.079. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
3
Anesthetic type and risk of myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中颈动脉内膜切除术后的麻醉类型与心肌梗死风险
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):3-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
The neurological morbidity of carotid revascularisation: using markers of cellular brain injury to compare CEA and CAS.颈动脉血运重建的神经功能并发症:使用脑损伤细胞标志物比较颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉血管成形术与支架置入术。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.016. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
5
Stenting versus endarterectomy after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.既往同侧颈动脉内膜剥脱术后支架置入术与内膜剥脱术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.115. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
6
Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results.使用颈动脉内膜切除术或支架系统的颈动脉血运重建术(CaRESS)I期临床试验:1年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug;42(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.04.023.
7
Carotid artery stenting for recurrent carotid artery restenosis after previous ipsilateral carotid artery endarterectomy or stenting: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.颈动脉支架置入术治疗同侧颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后再发颈动脉狭窄:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.004.
8
Perioperative Embolization Load and S-100β Do Not Predict Cognitive Outcome after Carotid Revascularization.围手术期栓塞负荷和S-100β不能预测颈动脉血运重建术后的认知结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.044. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
10
Carotid artery revascularization in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: Stent or endarterectomy?对侧颈动脉闭塞患者的颈动脉血运重建:支架置入术还是动脉内膜切除术?
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1735-1748.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Significance of Serum MMP-9, S100-β and GFAP in Patients with Mental Disorders after Traumatic Brain Injury.血清基质金属蛋白酶-9、S100-β和胶质纤维酸性蛋白在创伤性脑损伤后精神障碍患者中的临床意义
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Jan;53(1):11-18. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i1.1805.
2
Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.侵入性心血管操作引起的临床和亚临床急性脑损伤。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Apr;22(4):273-303. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
S100-β aggravates spinal cord injury via activation of M1 macrophage phenotype.
S100-β 通过激活 M1 巨噬细胞表型加重脊髓损伤。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2021 Sep 1;21(3):401-412.
4
Carotid artery stenosis and inflammatory biomarkers: the role of inflammation-induced immunological responses affecting the vascular systems.颈动脉狭窄与炎症生物标志物:炎症诱导的免疫反应对血管系统的影响作用
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1276. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4388.