Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Jan;19(1):11-15. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-1-11.
The expansion of new forms of public media, including social media, exposes clinicians to more illness experiences/narratives than ever before and increases the range of ways to interact with the people depicted. Existing professional regulations and ethics codes offer very limited guidance for such situations. We discuss the ethics of responding to such scenarios through presenting three cases of clinicians encountering television or social media stories involving potential unmet healthcare needs. We offer a structured framework for health workers to think through their responses to such situations, based around four key questions for the clinician to deliberate upon: who is vulnerable to harm; what can be done; who is best placed to do it; and what could go wrong? We illustrate the application of this framework to our three cases.
新形式的公共媒体(包括社交媒体)的扩展,使临床医生比以往任何时候都能接触到更多的疾病经历/叙述,并增加了与所描绘的人互动的方式。现有的专业法规和道德准则对此类情况提供的指导非常有限。我们通过介绍临床医生遇到涉及潜在未满足医疗需求的电视或社交媒体故事的三个案例,讨论了应对此类情况的伦理问题。我们提供了一个结构化的框架,让卫生工作者在思考对这些情况的反应时,围绕临床医生需要思考的四个关键问题:谁容易受到伤害;可以做些什么;谁最适合做;以及可能会出什么问题?我们将该框架应用于我们的三个案例。