Suppr超能文献

安大略省圭尔夫市对社区猫的认知及其管理偏好。第一部分:定量分析。

Perceptions of community cats and preferences for their management in Guelph, Ontario. Part I: A quantitative analysis.

作者信息

Van Patter Lauren, Flockhart Tyler, Coe Jason, Berke Olaf, Goller Rodrigo, Hovorka Alice, Bateman Shane

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences (Bateman), Department of Population Medicine (Coe, Berke), Ontario Veterinary College, Department of Geography (Van Patter), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1; University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Ringgold standard institution - Appalachian Laboratory, 301 Braddock Road, Cambridge, Maryland 21613, USA (Flockhart); City of Guelph - Intergovernmental Relations, Policy & Open Government, Guelph, Ontario (Goller); Queen's University - Geography & Planning, Kingston, Ontario (Hovorka).

出版信息

Can Vet J. 2019 Jan;60(1):41-47.

Abstract

In 2014, 116 Guelph residents were surveyed to investigate attitudes about community cats and preferences for population management. There are an estimated 29 579 owned cats in Guelph, an estimated 40% of residents allow outdoor access to their cat(s), and 8054 households (15%) feed community cats. Participants reported more concern with community cat welfare than nuisance behavior. There were high levels of support for responsible pet ownership education (90%), accessible or low-cost spay/neuter (86%), and trap-neuter-return (78%), and low levels of support for inaction (4%) and euthanasia (20%). Respondents who did not own cats or who considered cats as "pests" or a "non-native, invasive species" were more supportive of euthanasia. Results suggest that Guelph residents want to see action taken to address community cat population concerns, and that proactive management tools such as education, accessible or low-cost spay/neuter, and trap-neuter-return would be well supported and less divisive than euthanasia.

摘要

2014年,圭尔夫市对116名居民进行了调查,以了解他们对社区猫的态度以及对种群管理的偏好。据估计,圭尔夫市有29579只家养猫,估计40%的居民允许他们的猫外出,8054户家庭(15%)喂养社区猫。参与者表示,他们更关心社区猫的福利而不是滋扰行为。对负责任的宠物饲养教育(90%)、可获得的或低成本的绝育/去势服务(86%)以及诱捕-绝育-放归(78%)有很高的支持率,而对不作为(4%)和安乐死(20%)的支持率较低。不养猫或认为猫是“害虫”或“非本地入侵物种”的受访者更支持安乐死。结果表明,圭尔夫市居民希望看到采取行动解决社区猫种群问题,并且像教育、可获得的或低成本的绝育/去势服务以及诱捕-绝育-放归这样的积极管理工具将得到大力支持,并且比分娩安乐死更少引起争议。

相似文献

4
Effect of high-impact targeted trap-neuter-return and adoption of community cats on cat intake to a shelter.
Vet J. 2014 Sep;201(3):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 5.
5
A review of feral cat control.
J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Aug;10(4):366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
6
The effects of implementing a feral cat spay/neuter program in a Florida county animal control service.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2002;5(4):285-98. doi: 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0504_03.
7
A survey of opinions towards dog and cat management policy issues in New Zealand.
N Z Vet J. 2019 Nov;67(6):315-322. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2019.1645627. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
8
Results of a free spay/neuter program in a Hispanic colonia on the Texas-Mexico border.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2008;11(4):346-51. doi: 10.1080/10888700802330010.
9
Welfare Impacts of Spay/Neuter-Focused Outreach on Companion Animals in New York City Public Housing.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):257-272. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1305904. Epub 2017 May 8.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes towards urban stray cats and managing their population in India: a pilot study.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Oct 27;10:1274243. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1274243. eCollection 2023.
3
Attitudes and practices toward feral cats of male and female dog or cat owners and non-owners in Seoul, South Korea.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Oct 24;10:1230067. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1230067. eCollection 2023.
4
Rethinking the Animal Shelter's Role in Free-Roaming Cat Management.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 8;9:847081. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.847081. eCollection 2022.
5
Guidance for management of free-roaming community cats: a bioeconomic analysis.
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Oct;24(10):975-985. doi: 10.1177/1098612X211055685. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Perspectives of Canadian and American Cat Owners on Provision of Uncontrolled Outdoor Access for Owned Domestic Cats.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 26;8:742245. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.742245. eCollection 2021.
7
Application of a high-quality, high-volume trap-neuter-return model of community cats in Seoul, Korea.
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 5;8:e8711. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8711. eCollection 2020.
8
Outdoor cats - or community cats?
Can Vet J. 2019 Apr;60(4):349-352.
9
The Road to TNR: Examining Trap-Neuter-Return Through the Lens of Our Evolving Ethics.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jan 11;5:341. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00341. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

3
Community Attitudes and Practices of Urban Residents Regarding Predation by Pet Cats on Wildlife: An International Comparison.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 6;11(4):e0151962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151962. eCollection 2016.
5
Simulating free-roaming cat population management options in open demographic environments.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e113553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113553. eCollection 2014.
7
Desires and management preferences of stakeholders regarding feral cats in the Hawaiian islands.
Conserv Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):392-403. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12201. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
8
Number and ownership profiles of cats and dogs in the UK.
Vet Rec. 2010 Feb 6;166(6):163-8. doi: 10.1136/vr.b4712.
10
Attitudes toward and perceptions of free-roaming cats among individuals living in Ohio.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Apr 15;232(8):1159-67. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.8.1159.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验