Suppr超能文献

需要心血管重症监护的患者血尿酸水平的预后影响 - 血清尿酸是否是重症监护非外科病房重症患者的替代生物标志物?

The prognostic impact of the uric acid level in patients who require cardiovascular intensive care - is serum uric acid a surrogate biomarker for critical patients in the non-surgical intensive care unit?

机构信息

Division of Intensive Care Unit, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Sep;9(6):636-648. doi: 10.1177/2048872618822473. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of hyperuricemia and the factors that induce hyperuricemia in cardiovascular intensive care patients remain unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3257 emergency department patients were screened, and data for 2435 patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit were analyzed. The serum uric acid level was measured within 15 min of admission. The patients were assigned to a low-uric acid group (uric acid ⩽7.0 mg/dl, =1595) or a high-uric acid group (uric acid >7.0 mg/dl, =840) according to their uric acid level on admission. Thereafter, the patients were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of their serum uric acid level (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4), and uric acid levels and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed a significantly lower 365-day survival rate in a high-uric acid group than in a low-uric acid group, and in Q3 than in Q1 or Q2 and in Q4 than in the other groups. The multivariate logistic regression model for 30-day mortality identified Q4 (odds ratio: 1.856, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.140-3.022; =0.013) as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve values of the serum uric acid level and APACHE II score for the prediction of 30-day mortality were 0.648 and 0.800, respectively. The category-free net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement showed that the calculated risk shifted to the correct direction by adding the serum uric acid level to the APACHE II score (0.204, 95% CI 0.065-0.344; =0.004, and 0.015, 95% CI 0.005-0.025; =0.004, respectively). The prognosis, including the 365-day mortality, among patients with a high uric acid level and a high APACHE II score was significantly poorer in comparison with other patients.

CONCLUSION

The serum uric acid level, which might be elevated by the various critical stimuli on admission, was an independent predictor in patients who were emergently hospitalized in the intensive care unit. The serum uric acid level is therefore useful as a surrogate biomarker for critical patients in the intensive care unit.

摘要

背景

心血管重症监护患者的高尿酸血症的预后影响和导致高尿酸血症的因素仍不清楚。

方法和结果

共筛选了 3257 例急诊患者,分析了 2435 例收入重症监护病房的患者的数据。入院 15 分钟内测量血清尿酸水平。根据入院时的尿酸水平,将患者分为低尿酸组(尿酸 ⩽7.0mg/dl,=1595)或高尿酸组(尿酸 >7.0mg/dl,=840)。此后,根据血清尿酸水平的四分位数(Q1、Q2、Q3 和 Q4)将患者分为四组,并比较尿酸水平和急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE II)评分。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示高尿酸组的 365 天生存率明显低于低尿酸组,Q3 组明显低于 Q1 或 Q2 组,Q4 组明显低于其他组。30 天死亡率的多变量 logistic 回归模型确定 Q4(优势比:1.856,95%置信区间(CI)1.140-3.022;=0.013)为 30 天死亡率的独立预测因素。预测 30 天死亡率的血清尿酸水平和 APACHE II 评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积值分别为 0.648 和 0.800。无分类净重新分类改善和综合判别改善表明,通过将血清尿酸水平添加到 APACHE II 评分中,计算风险向正确方向转移(0.204,95%CI 0.065-0.344;=0.004,和 0.015,95%CI 0.005-0.025;=0.004,分别)。与其他患者相比,尿酸水平较高且 APACHE II 评分较高的患者的预后,包括 365 天死亡率,明显较差。

结论

入院时各种危急刺激可能导致血清尿酸水平升高,是紧急入住重症监护病房患者的独立预测因素。因此,血清尿酸水平可用作重症监护病房危重患者的替代生物标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验