From the Division of Cardiology (Hung), Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City; Department of Internal Medicine (Hung), School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City; Division of Cardiology (Mao, Hung, Chen), Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan; Department of Psychiatry (Wang, Lee), Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City; Department of Psychiatry (Wang, Lee), School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City; Department of Medical Research and Education (Yeh), Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; University of California (Hu), Riverside; Department of Cardiology (Hu), Riverside Medical Clinic, California; and Division of Cardiology (Chang), Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taiwan.
Psychosom Med. 2019 Apr;81(3):237-245. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000666.
Anxiety and depression are risk factors for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but their effects on coronary artery spasm (CAS) remain unestablished.
Patient records in this population-based study were retrospectively collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Using propensity score matching, we used 1:1:1 ratio stratification into a control group of 10,325 individuals without CAS or CAD, a CAS group comprising 10,473 patients, and a CAD group comprising 10,473 patients during 2000-2012.
The prevalence of CAS and CAD was 0.067% and 8.7%, respectively, in the general population. The prevalence of anxiety and depression diagnoses was significantly higher in patients with new-onset CAS than in those with new-onset CAD and controls without CAS/CAD, even after propensity score matching. Compared with CAD, anxiety and depression diagnoses conferred a higher risk of developing CAS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.14-2.45, p < .001, and OR = 1.34, 95% CI, 1.08-1.66, p = .007, respectively). The association was even stronger when comparing CAS with the control group without CAD or CAS (OR = 5.20, 95% CI, 4.72-5.74, p < .001, and OR = 1.98, 95% CI, 1.50-2.62, p < .001, respectively). The increased risk of new-onset CAS as related to previous anxiety and depression diagnoses was comparable between males and females.
Compared with CAD or the general population, anxiety and depression diagnoses confer a higher risk of developing CAS. No sex differences are found for the association of anxiety and depression with CAS.
焦虑和抑郁是阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的危险因素,但它们对冠状动脉痉挛(CAS)的影响尚未确定。
本基于人群的研究中的患者记录是从台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中回顾性收集的。我们使用倾向评分匹配,将患者 1:1:1 比例分层为对照组(无 CAS 或 CAD 的个体)10325 例、CAS 组 10473 例和 CAD 组 10473 例,研究时间为 2000 年至 2012 年。
在普通人群中,CAS 和 CAD 的患病率分别为 0.067%和 8.7%。与新诊断 CAD 患者和无 CAS/CAD 的对照组相比,新发 CAS 患者中焦虑和抑郁诊断的患病率显著更高,即使在进行倾向评分匹配后也是如此。与 CAD 相比,焦虑和抑郁诊断与 CAS 的发病风险更高相关(比值比 [OR] = 2.29,95%置信区间 [CI],2.14-2.45,p <.001,和 OR = 1.34,95% CI,1.08-1.66,p =.007)。当将 CAS 与无 CAD 或 CAS 的对照组相比时,相关性更强(OR = 5.20,95% CI,4.72-5.74,p <.001,和 OR = 1.98,95% CI,1.50-2.62,p <.001)。与焦虑和抑郁既往诊断相关的新发 CAS 的风险增加在男性和女性之间是相当的。
与 CAD 或普通人群相比,焦虑和抑郁诊断与 CAS 的发病风险更高相关。焦虑和抑郁与 CAS 的相关性在男性和女性之间没有发现性别差异。