• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉注射阿替普酶溶栓治疗后不同时间点给予替罗非班的疗效

Efficacy of Tirofiban Administered at Different Time Points after Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy with Alteplase in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

作者信息

Liu Jin, Shi Qiuyan, Sun Yuan, He Jingyuan, Yang Bin, Zhang Chunyang, Guo Rui

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063000, China.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):1126-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.044. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.044
PMID:30655038
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of tirofiban administered at different time points within 24 hours of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase and fulfilled other inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the time points of tirofiban administration: Group A (2 h), Group B (2-12 h), Group C (12-24 h), and Group D (control). The changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, modified Rankin Scale score, and adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

At 7 ± 1 day, the efficacy in Group A was better than that in Group C (P = .006) and Group D (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the efficacy between Groups A and B (P = .268). Similarly, at 14 ± 2 d, the efficacy in Group A was better than that in Group C (P = .026) and Group D (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the efficacy between Groups A and B (P = .394). As evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale, the prognosis in Groups A, B, and C was better than that in Group D (P = .042, .008, .027, respectively), which was unrelated to the time points of tirofiban administration. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban combined with alteplase is effective and safe, and particularly beneficial when administered at 2 hour and 2-12 hours after intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke.

摘要

目的

评估替罗非班在急性缺血性卒中患者静脉注射阿替普酶后24小时内不同时间点给药的疗效。

方法

接受阿替普酶静脉溶栓且符合其他纳入标准的患者,根据替罗非班给药时间点随机分为4组:A组(2小时)、B组(2 - 12小时)、C组(12 - 24小时)和D组(对照组)。分析美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、改良Rankin量表评分及不良事件的变化。

结果

在7±1天时,A组疗效优于C组(P = 0.006)和D组(P = 0.001),但A组与B组疗效差异无统计学意义(P = 0.268)。同样,在14±2天时,A组疗效优于C组(P = 0.026)和D组(P = 0.001),但A组与B组疗效差异无统计学意义(P = 0.394)。根据改良Rankin量表评估,A、B、C组的预后均优于D组(分别为P = 0.042、0.008、0.027),且与替罗非班给药时间点无关。四组不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义。

结论

替罗非班联合阿替普酶有效且安全,尤其在急性缺血性卒中患者静脉注射阿替普酶后2小时及2 - 12小时给药时更有益。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Tirofiban Administered at Different Time Points after Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy with Alteplase in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉注射阿替普酶溶栓治疗后不同时间点给予替罗非班的疗效
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):1126-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.044. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
2
Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Early Tirofiban Treatment After Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.急性缺血性脑卒中患者阿替普酶溶栓后早期替罗非班治疗的安全性和初步疗效。
Stroke. 2016 Oct;47(10):2649-51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014413. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
3
Even Faster Door-to-Alteplase Times and Associated Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.更快的急性缺血性脑卒中患者门到溶栓时间及相关结局
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Dec;28(12):104329. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104329. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
Effect of intravenous tirofiban and aspirin in reducing short-term and long-term neurologic deficit in patients with ischemic stroke: a double-blind randomized trial.静脉注射替罗非班和阿司匹林对降低缺血性脑卒中患者短期和长期神经功能缺损的影响:一项双盲随机试验。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Feb;29(3):275-81. doi: 10.1159/000275503. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
5
Low-Dose Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低剂量组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):381-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
6
Comparative Analysis on Low- and Standard-Dose Regimes of Alteplase Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Efficacy and Safety.急性缺血性卒中阿替普酶溶栓治疗低剂量与标准剂量方案的比较分析:疗效与安全性
Eur Neurol. 2018;79(1-2):68-73. doi: 10.1159/000485460. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Correlation of Changes in Leukocytes Levels 24 Hours after Intravenous Thrombolysis With Prognosis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后24小时白细胞水平变化与预后的相关性
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Oct;27(10):2857-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Study of Wake-Up Ischemic Strokes Guided by Rapid MRI.快速 MRI 指导下的清醒型缺血性卒中的重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;48(1-2):85-90. doi: 10.1159/000503379. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
9
Effects of Oral Antiplatelet Agents and Tirofiban on Functional Outcomes of Patients with Non-Disabling Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke.口服抗血小板药物和替罗非班对非致残性小急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104829. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104829. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中发病3至4.5小时后使用阿替普酶进行溶栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase in patients with acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉注射尿激酶溶栓后替罗非班的安全性和有效性
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 6;16:1529331. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1529331. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy, safety, and effect on platelet activation of the timing of administration of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke.替罗非班在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的给药时机对疗效、安全性及血小板活化的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 15;17(2):791-805. doi: 10.62347/JUCB8921. eCollection 2025.
3
Intravenous thrombolysis plus tirofiban versus tirofiban alone in Caucasian patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction.
静脉溶栓联合替罗非班与单纯替罗非班治疗白种人急性脉络膜前动脉或脑桥旁正中梗死的疗效比较
Brain Circ. 2024 Sep 26;10(3):250-256. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_15_24. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Early antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后早期抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Feb;46(2):617-631. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07821-0. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Early Neurological Deterioration and Time to Start Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Mild-to-Moderate Ischemic Stroke: A Pre-Specified Post Hoc Analysis of the ATAMIS Trial.急性轻至中度缺血性卒中患者的早期神经功能恶化及开始双重抗血小板治疗的时间:ATAMIS试验的一项预先指定的事后分析
J Stroke. 2024 Sep;26(3):403-414. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.02250. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
6
Early tirofiban administration after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (ADVENT): Study protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后早期替罗非班治疗(ADVENT):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验方案。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Jun;9(2):510-514. doi: 10.1177/23969873231225069. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Prospective pilot study of tirofiban in progressive stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.替罗非班用于静脉溶栓后进展性卒中的前瞻性试点研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 4;13:982684. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.982684. eCollection 2022.
8
Safety and efficacy of low-dose rt-PA with tirofiban to treat acute non-cardiogenic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled study.替罗非班联合小剂量 rt-PA 治疗急性非心源性脑梗死的安全性及有效性:一项单中心随机对照研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02808-w.
9
Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke.替罗非班单药治疗与急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效及安全性的关系。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02268-8.
10
Efficacy of using thromboelastography to detect coagulation function and platelet function in patients with acute cerebral infarction.应用血栓弹力图检测急性脑梗死患者凝血功能及血小板功能的效果。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2021 Dec;121(6):1661-1667. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01456-6. Epub 2020 Aug 5.