• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值是预测前列腺特异性抗原在4至10 ng/dl之间的患者患前列腺癌的一个有价值的标志物。

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a valuable marker to predict prostate cancer in patients with prostate specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/dl.

作者信息

Caglayan Volkan, Onen Efe, Avci Sinan, Sambel Murat, Kilic Metin, Oner Sedat, Aydos Mustafa Murat, Yıldız Halil Emre

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Jan 17;90(4):270-275. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.4.270.

DOI:10.4081/aiua.2018.4.270
PMID:30655640
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum inflammation markers derived from complete blood count in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 621 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between March 2013 and April 2018. Age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, platelet count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, prostate volume (PV) and pathology result of the patients were recorded. Patients were grouped as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis and PCa. Patients were also grouped according to PSA values, as PSA < 4 , PSA 4-10 and PSA > 10 ng/dl.

RESULTS

The mean lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) value of the patients with PCa was significantly lower in the entire cohort (p = 0.047). In the PSA 4-10 ng/dl range, LMR value wassignificantly lower in patients with PCa than those with BPH or prostatitis (p = 0.012). In this PSA range, free/total PSA ratio and LMR were significant factors to predict PCa. The cut-off values of LMR, free/total PSA were 3.05 and 0.15 respectively. The sensitivities, spesificities, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values using LMR cut-off, free/total PSA cut-off and their combination were assessed. Specificity and PPV of the combination group were higher (97.2%, 83.3% respectively) compared to free/total PSA cut-off group (91.6%, 76.6%) and LMR cut-off group (67.8%, 43.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

LMR is a useful tool at detecting PCa especially in patients with PSA value between 4 and 10 ng/dl. The combination of free/total PSA ratio and LMR improves the diagnostic accuracy more than the use of free/total PSA ratio alone.

摘要

目的

评估全血细胞计数衍生的血清炎症标志物在前列腺癌(PCa)诊断中的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2018年4月间621例行前列腺穿刺活检患者的数据。记录患者的年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、游离PSA、血小板计数、中性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数、单核细胞计数、前列腺体积(PV)及病理结果。患者分为良性前列腺增生(BPH)、前列腺炎和PCa组。患者还根据PSA值分为PSA<4、PSA 4-10和PSA>10 ng/dl组。

结果

在整个队列中,PCa患者的平均淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)显著降低(p=0.047)。在PSA 4-10 ng/dl范围内,PCa患者的LMR值显著低于BPH或前列腺炎患者(p=0.012)。在此PSA范围内,游离/总PSA比值和LMR是预测PCa的重要因素。LMR、游离/总PSA的截断值分别为3.05和0.15。评估了使用LMR截断值、游离/总PSA截断值及其组合的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值。与游离/总PSA截断值组(91.6%,76.6%)和LMR截断值组(67.8%,43.7%)相比,联合组的特异性和PPV更高(分别为97.2%,83.3%)。

结论

LMR是检测PCa的有用工具,尤其是在PSA值介于4至10 ng/dl之间的患者中。游离/总PSA比值与LMR联合使用比单独使用游离/总PSA比值能提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a valuable marker to predict prostate cancer in patients with prostate specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/dl.淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值是预测前列腺特异性抗原在4至10 ng/dl之间的患者患前列腺癌的一个有价值的标志物。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Jan 17;90(4):270-275. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.4.270.
2
Predictive Value of the Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.血小板与淋巴细胞比值在前列腺癌诊断中的预测价值
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6407-12. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6407.
3
Benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer differentiation via platelet to lymphocyte ratio.通过血小板与淋巴细胞比值鉴别良性前列腺增生和前列腺癌
Cancer Biomark. 2015;15(3):317-23. doi: 10.3233/CBM-150458.
4
In prostatism patients the ratio of human glandular kallikrein to free PSA improves the discrimination between prostate cancer and benign hyperplasia within the diagnostic "gray zone" of total PSA 4 to 10 ng/mL.在前列腺增生患者中,人腺体激肽释放酶与游离前列腺特异抗原的比值在总前列腺特异抗原4至10 ng/mL的诊断“灰色地带”内提高了前列腺癌与良性前列腺增生之间的鉴别能力。
Urology. 1998 Sep;52(3):360-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00245-3.
5
Accurate cut-off point for free to total prostate-specific antigen ratio used to improve differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia in Iranian population.用于改善伊朗人群中前列腺癌与良性前列腺增生鉴别诊断的游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值的准确临界值。
Urol J. 2010 Jun 10;7(2):99-104.
6
Optimum PSA reflex-range.最佳前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反射范围。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2006 Jun;78(2):44-8.
7
Subtypes of white blood cells in patients with prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia and healthy individuals.前列腺癌或良性前列腺增生患者及健康个体的白细胞亚型。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(8):4779-83. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.8.4779.
8
[Study of free to total prostate specific antigen ratio in the detection of patients with prostate cancer].[游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值在前列腺癌患者检测中的研究]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2000 Dec;91(12):695-9. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.91.695.
9
Additional value of the ratio of serum total testosterone to total prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a Chinese population.血清总睾酮与总前列腺特异性抗原比值在中国人群前列腺癌诊断中的附加价值。
Andrologia. 2018 Mar;50(2). doi: 10.1111/and.12872. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
10
Determination of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen helps to avoid unnecessary biopsies in men with normal rectal examinations and total prostate-specific antigen of 4-10 ng/ml.游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比的测定有助于避免对直肠检查正常且总前列腺特异性抗原为4 - 10 ng/ml的男性进行不必要的活检。
Eur Urol. 2000 Mar;37(3):289-96. doi: 10.1159/000052358.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of controlling nutritional status score for prostate cancer diagnosis.控制营养状况评分对前列腺癌诊断的预测价值。
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 21;14:1268800. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1268800. eCollection 2024.
2
Inflammation-related indicators have a potential to increase overall quality of the prostate cancer management: a narrative review.炎症相关指标对提高前列腺癌管理的整体质量具有潜在作用:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 May 31;12(5):809-822. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-55. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Diagnostic Efficiency of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value to Predict Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen between 4 and 20 ng/mL.
全免疫炎症值对前列腺特异性抗原在4至20 ng/mL之间的患者预测前列腺癌的诊断效能
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 19;12(3):820. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030820.
4
Role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio and platelets in prognosis of patients with prostate cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值及血小板在前列腺癌患者预后中的作用。
Oncol Lett. 2022 Jul 8;24(3):305. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13425. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Preoperative inflammatory markers for predicting parathyroid carcinoma.用于预测甲状旁腺癌的术前炎症标志物。
Endocr Connect. 2022 Jul 14;11(7). doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0062. Print 2022 Jul 1.
6
Racial differences in the systemic inflammatory response to prostate cancer.种族差异与前列腺癌的全身炎症反应。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0252951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252951. eCollection 2021.
7
Validation of the Effectiveness of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as a Predictive Factor in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml.验证中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)在 4.0 至 10.0ng/ml 之间的前列腺活检患者中的预测因子的有效性。
In Vivo. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):1641-1646. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12422.
8
The Diagnostic Values of Pretreatment Serum Inflammation Markers and Lipoprotein in Men With Total Prostate-Specific Antigen Between 4 and 10 ng/ml.总前列腺特异性抗原水平在4至10 ng/ml之间的男性患者中,治疗前血清炎症标志物和脂蛋白的诊断价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 4;7:576812. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.576812. eCollection 2020.
9
A novel nomogram predicting the risk of positive biopsy for patients in the diagnostic gray area of prostate cancer.一种预测处于前列腺癌诊断灰色地带患者活检阳性风险的新型列线图。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74703-8.
10
Utility of inflammatory markers to predict adverse outcome in acute pancreatitis: A retrospective study in a single academic center.炎症标志物预测急性胰腺炎不良结局的效用:一项在单一学术中心的回顾性研究。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 21;26(4):216-21. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_49_20.