Mahtani Reshma L, Vogel Charles L
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Deerfield Beach, FL, USA,
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jan 4;11:513-524. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S186658. eCollection 2019.
Combination therapy with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC) has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) over AI monotherapy without adding substantial toxicity. However, CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI therapy is not uniformly used as first-line therapy for ABC, indicating that barriers to CDK4/6 inhibitor use exist. Such barriers may include the following perceptions: patients with bone-only metastases, with a long disease-free interval, or who are older may respond to AI monotherapy and may not benefit from a CDK4/6 inhibitor; tumor response rates may be lower and delayed with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI therapy than chemotherapy; the increased incidence of adverse events with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI therapy outweighs benefits; and the cost of CDK4/6 inhibitors may be prohibitive. Some of these barriers are addressed with data from follow-up analyses of CDK4/6 inhibitor trials, which have shown a PFS benefit of combination therapy in all subgroups assessed, including older patients, those with bone-only metastatic disease, and those with a long disease-free interval. Tumor response rates with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI therapy are comparable to those with first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy. Finally, adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI therapy are manageable and occur with decreasing severity during treatment, with similar reports of quality of life to those with AI monotherapy. These data support CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI therapy as the standard of care in first-line treatment of ABC.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6(CDK4/6)抑制剂与芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)联合用于绝经后晚期乳腺癌(ABC)女性的一线治疗,已证明与AI单药治疗相比,无进展生存期(PFS)有所改善,且未增加显著毒性。然而,CDK4/6抑制剂加AI疗法并未被一致用作ABC的一线治疗,这表明使用CDK4/6抑制剂存在障碍。这些障碍可能包括以下观念:仅骨转移、无病间期长或年龄较大的患者可能对AI单药治疗有反应,可能无法从CDK4/6抑制剂中获益;与化疗相比,CDK4/6抑制剂加AI疗法的肿瘤反应率可能更低且延迟;CDK4/6抑制剂加AI疗法不良事件发生率增加超过了益处;以及CDK4/6抑制剂的成本可能过高。CDK4/6抑制剂试验的随访分析数据解决了其中一些障碍,这些数据表明联合治疗在所有评估的亚组中均有PFS获益,包括老年患者、仅骨转移疾病患者和无病间期长的患者。CDK4/6抑制剂加AI疗法的肿瘤反应率与一线细胞毒性化疗相当。最后,与CDK4/6抑制剂加AI疗法相关的不良事件是可控的,且在治疗期间严重程度降低,生活质量报告与AI单药治疗相似。这些数据支持CDK4/6抑制剂加AI疗法作为ABC一线治疗的标准治疗方案。