Reeves Jacob M, Athwal George S, Johnson James A, Langohr G Daniel G
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Western University Canada, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A3K7, Canada e-mail: .
Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, 268 Grosvenor StreetE-p, London, ON N6A4V2, Canada e-mail: .
J Biomech Eng. 2019 Mar 1;141(3). doi: 10.1115/1.4042172.
An important feature of humeral orthopedic finite element (FE) models is the trabecular stiffness relationship. These relationships depend on the anatomic site from which they are derived; but have not been developed for the humerus. As a consequence, humeral FE modeling relies on relationships for other anatomic sites. The variation in humeral FE outcomes due to the trabecular stiffness relationship is assessed. Stemless arthroplasty FE models were constructed from CT scans of eight humeri. Models were loaded corresponding to 45 deg and 75 deg abduction. Each bone was modeled five times with the only variable being the trabecular stiffness relationship: four derived from different anatomic-sites and one pooled across sites. The FE outcome measures assessed were implant-bone contact percentage, von Mises of the change in stress, and bone response potential. The variance attributed to the selection of the trabecular stiffness relationship was quantified as the standard deviation existing between models of different trabecular stiffness. Overall, variability due to changing the trabecular stiffness relationship was low for all humeral FE outcome measures assessed. The variability was highest within the stress and bone formation potential outcome measures of the trabecular region. Variability only exceeded 10% in the trabecular stress change within two of the eight slices evaluated. In conclusion, the low variations attributable to the selection of a trabecular stiffness relationship based on anatomic-site suggest that FE models constructed for shoulder arthroplasty can utilize an inhomogeneous site-pooled trabecular relationship without inducing marked variability in the assessed outcome measures.
肱骨骨科有限元(FE)模型的一个重要特征是小梁刚度关系。这些关系取决于它们所源自的解剖部位;但尚未针对肱骨建立。因此,肱骨有限元建模依赖于其他解剖部位的关系。评估了由于小梁刚度关系导致的肱骨有限元结果的变化。从八具肱骨的CT扫描构建了无柄关节置换有限元模型。模型加载对应于45°和75°外展的情况。每根骨头用五种方式建模,唯一的变量是小梁刚度关系:四种源自不同解剖部位,一种是跨部位汇总的。评估的有限元结果指标是植入物与骨的接触百分比、应力变化的冯·米塞斯应力以及骨反应潜力。归因于小梁刚度关系选择的方差被量化为不同小梁刚度模型之间存在的标准差。总体而言,对于所有评估的肱骨有限元结果指标,由于改变小梁刚度关系导致的变异性较低。在小梁区域的应力和骨形成潜力结果指标中,变异性最高。在评估的八层中的两层内,小梁应力变化的变异性仅超过10%。总之,基于解剖部位选择小梁刚度关系所导致的低变异性表明,为肩关节置换构建的有限元模型可以使用不均匀的部位汇总小梁关系,而不会在评估的结果指标中引起明显的变异性。