Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Orthopedic Department, University Hospital Jena, Campus Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Str. 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):768-774. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05881-x. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
In total joint replacement, culturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. However, its role in postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) is not well investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity of sonication in detecting infection following instrumented spine surgery.
In this prospective controlled consecutive cohort study, patients undergoing spinal revision between September 2016 and March 2018 were analyzed. In all patients sonication of removed spinal implants and at least one peri-implant tissue culture were performed. Demographic data, including age, gender, clinical manifestation, comorbidities, laboratory values (CRP and blood leukocytes), were recorded. Microorganisms causing PSII were documented. Sensitivity and specificity of sonication and peri-implant tissue culture were evaluated.
A total of 118 patients were included. PSII was diagnosed in 35 patients, representing 29.6% of the study cohort. Sensitivities of tissue and sonication fluid culture were 65.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48.6-80.0) and 94.3% (95% CI 85.7-100) (p value = 0.002) and specificities 96.4% (95% CI 91.6-100) and 98.8% (95% CI 96.4-100), respectively. The most common microorganisms found in PSII were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Propionibacterium acnes. Eleven PSIIs were detected only by sonicate fluid culture.
Culture of samples obtained by spinal implant sonication was more sensitive than conventional peri-implant tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of PSII. Therefore, sonication should be used as a routine tool in the diagnostic workup of PSII. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
在全关节置换术中,与传统的假体周围组织培养相比,对取出的植入物的超声冲洗液进行培养在假体关节感染的微生物诊断方面更具敏感性。然而,其在术后脊柱植入物感染(PSII)中的作用尚未得到充分研究。因此,本研究旨在确定超声冲洗在检测脊柱内固定术后感染中的有效性。
在这项前瞻性对照连续队列研究中,分析了 2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 3 月期间接受脊柱翻修手术的患者。所有患者均进行了取出的脊柱植入物的超声冲洗以及至少一次假体周围组织培养。记录了人口统计学数据,包括年龄、性别、临床表现、合并症、实验室值(CRP 和白细胞)。记录引起 PSII 的微生物。评估了超声冲洗和假体周围组织培养的敏感性和特异性。
共纳入 118 例患者。35 例(29.6%)患者诊断为 PSII。组织和超声冲洗液培养的敏感性分别为 65.7%(95%置信区间 [CI] 48.6-80.0)和 94.3%(95% CI 85.7-100)(p 值=0.002),特异性分别为 96.4%(95% CI 91.6-100)和 98.8%(95% CI 96.4-100)。PSII 中最常见的微生物是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌。11 例 PSII 仅通过超声冲洗液培养检测到。
与传统的假体周围组织培养相比,对脊柱植入物超声冲洗液的培养在 PSII 的微生物诊断方面更具敏感性。因此,超声冲洗应作为 PSII 诊断的常规工具。这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中检索到。