Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2019 Apr;74(4):480-487. doi: 10.1111/anae.14581. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Conventional emergency front of neck airway training manikins mimic slim patients and are associated with unrealistic procedural ease. We have described previously a pork belly-modified manikin that more realistically simulated an obese patient's neck. In this study, we compared a novel obese-synthetic manikin (obese-synthetic manikin) with a pork belly-modified manikin (obese-meat manikin) and a conventional slim manikin (slim manikin). Thirty-three experienced anaesthetists undertook simulated emergency front of neck airway procedures on each manikin (total 99 procedures). Time to ventilation was longer on both obese manikins compared with the slim manikin (median (IQR [range]) time to intubation 159 (126-243 [73-647]) s in the obese-synthetic, 105 (72-138 [43-279]) s in the obese-meat and 58 (47-74 [30-370]) s in the slim manikin; p < 0.001 between each manikin). Cricothyroidotomy success rate was similar in the both obese manikins but lower when compared with the slim manikin (15/33 obese-synthetic vs. 14/33 obese-meat vs. 27/33 slim manikin). Participant feedback indicated performance difficulty was similar between both obese manikins, which were both more difficult than the slim manikin. The tissues of the obese-meat manikin were judged more realistic than those of either other manikin. Overall, the obese-synthetic manikin performed broadly similarly to the obese-meat manikin and was technically more difficult than the conventional slim manikin. The novel obese-synthetic manikin maybe useful for training and research in front of neck airway procedures.
传统的颈部紧急气道训练模型模拟瘦患者,并且与不切实际的程序简便性相关。我们之前描述了一种改良的猪腹模型,该模型更真实地模拟了肥胖患者的颈部。在这项研究中,我们比较了一种新型的肥胖-合成模型(肥胖合成模型)与改良的猪腹模型(肥胖肉质模型)和传统的瘦模型(瘦模型)。33 名经验丰富的麻醉师对每个模型(共 99 个程序)进行了模拟的紧急颈部气道程序。与瘦模型相比,两种肥胖模型的通气时间都更长(肥胖合成模型的中位(IQR [范围])插管时间为 159(126-243 [73-647])s,肥胖肉质模型为 105(72-138 [43-279])s,瘦模型为 58(47-74 [30-370])s;p<0.001)。两种肥胖模型的环甲膜切开术成功率相似,但低于瘦模型(肥胖合成模型 15/33 例,肥胖肉质模型 14/33 例,瘦模型 27/33 例)。参与者的反馈表明,两种肥胖模型的操作难度相似,均比瘦模型困难。肥胖肉质模型的组织被认为比其他两种模型更真实。总体而言,肥胖合成模型的性能与肥胖肉质模型大致相似,比传统的瘦模型更具技术难度。新型肥胖合成模型可能对颈部气道程序的培训和研究有用。