• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊环境中抑郁和焦虑障碍治疗时间延长的预测:莱顿常规结局监测研究。

Prediction of prolonged treatment course for depressive and anxiety disorders in an outpatient setting: The Leiden routine outcome monitoring study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 15;247:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.035. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.035
PMID:30658244
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to improve clinical identification of patients with a prolonged treatment course for depressive and anxiety disorders early in treatment.

METHOD

We conducted a cohort study in 1.225 adult patients with a depressive or anxiety disorders in psychiatric specialty care setting between 2007 and 2011, with at least two Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) assessments within 6 months. With logistic regression, we modelled baseline age, gender, ethnicity, education, marital status, housing situation, employment status, psychiatric comorbidity and both baseline and 1st follow-up BSI scores to predict prolonged treatment course (>2 years). Based on the regression coefficients, we present an easy to use risk prediction score.

RESULTS

BSI at 1st follow-up proved to be a strong predictor for both depressive and anxiety disorders (OR = 2.17 (CI95% 1.73-2.74); OR = 2.52 (CI95% 1.86-3.23)). The final risk prediction score included BSI 1st follow-up and comorbid axis II disorder for depressive disorder, for anxiety disorders BSI 1st follow-up and age were included. For depressive disorders, for 28% of the patients with the highest scores, the positive predictive value for a prolonged treatment course was60% (sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.81). For anxiety disorders, for 35% of the patients with the highest scores, the positive predictive value for a prolonged treatment course was 52% (sensitivity 0.55, specificity 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

A high level of symptoms at 2-6 months of follow-up is a strong predictor for prolonged treatment course. This facilitates early identification of patients at risk of a prolonged course of treatment; in a relatively easy way by a self-assessed symptom severity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提高临床医生对治疗早期抑郁和焦虑障碍患者治疗过程延长的识别能力。

方法

我们对 2007 年至 2011 年间在精神科专科护理环境中接受治疗的 1225 名患有抑郁或焦虑障碍的成年患者进行了队列研究,这些患者在 6 个月内至少有两次Brief Symptom Inventory(BSI)评估。我们采用逻辑回归模型,根据基线年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、住房状况、就业状况、精神共病和基线及首次随访 BSI 评分来预测延长治疗过程(>2 年)。基于回归系数,我们提出了一种易于使用的风险预测评分。

结果

BSI 首次随访结果证明对抑郁和焦虑障碍均具有很强的预测能力(OR=2.17(95%CI95% 1.73-2.74);OR=2.52(95%CI95% 1.86-3.23))。最终的风险预测评分包括抑郁障碍的 BSI 首次随访和共病轴 II 障碍,焦虑障碍则包括 BSI 首次随访和年龄。对于抑郁障碍,在得分最高的 28%的患者中,延长治疗过程的阳性预测值为 60%(敏感性 0.38,特异性 0.81)。对于焦虑障碍,在得分最高的 35%的患者中,延长治疗过程的阳性预测值为 52%(敏感性 0.55,特异性 0.75)。

结论

在 2-6 个月随访时症状水平较高是延长治疗过程的强烈预测因素。这有助于及早识别治疗过程延长风险较高的患者;通过自我评估的症状严重程度,以相对简单的方式实现。

相似文献

1
Prediction of prolonged treatment course for depressive and anxiety disorders in an outpatient setting: The Leiden routine outcome monitoring study.门诊环境中抑郁和焦虑障碍治疗时间延长的预测:莱顿常规结局监测研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 15;247:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.035. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
2
Predicting outcomes of mood, anxiety and somatoform disorders: the Leiden routine outcome monitoring study.预测心境、焦虑和躯体形式障碍的结局:莱顿常规结局监测研究。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 15;142(1-3):122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.051. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
3
The clinical effectiveness of concise cognitive behavioral therapy with or without pharmacotherapy for depressive and anxiety disorders; a pragmatic randomized controlled equivalence trial in clinical practice.简明认知行为疗法联合或不联合药物治疗抑郁和焦虑障碍的临床疗效:临床实践中的实用随机对照等效试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.021. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Gender differences in outpatients with anxiety disorders: the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.焦虑障碍门诊患者的性别差异:莱顿常规结局监测研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Jun;25(3):278-87. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000414. Epub 2015 May 20.
5
Dimensions of the inventory of depressive symptomatology as predictors of the course of depressive and anxiety disorders.抑郁症状学清单的维度作为抑郁和焦虑障碍病程的预测因子。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Dec;46(12):1655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
6
Social support as a predictor of the outcome of depressive and anxiety disorder in short-term and long-term psychotherapy.社会支持作为短期和长期心理治疗中抑郁和焦虑障碍结局的预测指标。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Apr 30;216(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.050. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
7
Predicting outcome of depression using the depressive symptom profile: the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.使用抑郁症状谱预测抑郁结局:莱顿常规结局监测研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Jun;29(6):523-30. doi: 10.1002/da.21958. Epub 2012 May 3.
8
Comorbid anxiety and mood disorders among persons with social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍患者中的共病焦虑和情绪障碍。
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Jan;40(1):19-35. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00114-5.
9
Treatment outcomes for primary care patients with major depression and lifetime anxiety disorders.患有重度抑郁症和终生焦虑症的初级保健患者的治疗结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;153(10):1293-300. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.10.1293.
10
Current comorbidity of psychiatric disorders among DSM-IV major depressive disorder patients in psychiatric care in the Vantaa Depression Study.万塔抑郁症研究中接受精神科护理的DSM-IV重度抑郁症患者当前的精神疾病共病情况。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;63(2):126-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-management strategies and care needs of patients with persistent depressive disorder and their informal caregivers: a multi-perspectives qualitative interview study.持续性抑郁症患者及其非正式照料者的自我管理策略与护理需求:一项多视角定性访谈研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 20;16:1505396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1505396. eCollection 2025.
2
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of a self-management intervention for patients with persistent depressive disorder and their partners/caregivers: study protocol of a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial.持续性抑郁障碍患者及其伴侣/照护者自我管理干预的临床效果和成本效益:一项多中心实用随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Oct 23;22(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05666-y.
3
Psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory support the hypothesis of a general psychopathological factor.简明症状量表的心理测量特性支持一般精神病理因素的假设。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2022 May 19;44:e20210207. doi: 10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0207.