1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
2 Unit of Biostatistics and Biomathematics, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;53(8):772-781. doi: 10.1177/0004867418823268. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
Psychotic versus non-psychotic patients with bipolar disorder have been traditionally associated with different unfavorable clinical features. In this study on bipolar Italian patients, we aimed to compare clinical and demographic differences between psychotic and non-psychotic individuals, exploring clinical factors that may favor early diagnosis and personalized treatment.
A total of 1671 patients (males: = 712 and females: = 959; bipolar type 1: = 1038 and bipolar type 2: = 633) from different psychiatric departments were compared according to the lifetime presence of psychotic symptoms in terms of socio-demographic and clinical variables. Chi-square tests for qualitative variables and Student's -tests for quantitative variables were performed for group comparison, and a multivariable logistic regression was performed, considering the lifetime psychotic symptoms as dependent variables and socio-demographic/clinical characteristics as independent variables.
Psychotic versus non-psychotic bipolar subjects resulted to: be more frequently unemployed ( < 0.01) and never married/partnered ( < 0.01); have an earlier age at onset ( < 0.01); more frequently receive a first diagnosis different from a mood disorder ( < 0.01); have a shorter duration of untreated illness ( < 0.01); have a more frequently hypomanic/manic prevalent polarity ( < 0.01) and a prevalent manic-depressive type of cycling ( < 0.01); present a lower lifetime number of depressive episodes ( < 0.01), but have more manic episodes ( < 0.01); and less insight ( < 0.01) and more hospitalizations in the last year ( < 0.01). Multivariable regression analysis showed that psychotic versus non-psychotic bipolar patients received more frequently a first diagnosis different from bipolar disorder (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = [0.46, 0.90], = 0.02) or major depressive disorder (odds ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval = [0.48, 0.91], = 0.02), had more frequently a prevalent manic polarity (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = [1.14, 2.98], < 0.01) and had a higher number of lifetime manic episodes (more than six) (odds ratio = 8.79, 95% confidence interval = [5.93, 13.05], < 0.01).
Lifetime psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder are associated with unfavorable socio-demographic and clinical features as well as with a more frequent initial misdiagnosis.
有精神病性症状的双相障碍患者与无精神病性症状的双相障碍患者传统上与不同的不利临床特征相关。在这项针对意大利双相障碍患者的研究中,我们旨在比较精神病性和非精神病性个体之间的临床和人口统计学差异,探索可能有利于早期诊断和个体化治疗的临床因素。
根据一生中是否存在精神病性症状,对来自不同精神科的 1671 名患者(男性=712 人,女性=959 人;1 型双相障碍=1038 人,2 型双相障碍=633 人)进行比较,比较内容包括人口统计学和临床变量。对于定性变量使用卡方检验,对于定量变量使用 Student's -检验进行组间比较,并进行多变量逻辑回归分析,将一生中的精神病性症状作为因变量,将人口统计学/临床特征作为自变量。
有精神病性症状的双相障碍患者与无精神病性症状的双相障碍患者相比:更频繁地失业(<0.01)和未婚/无伴侣(<0.01);发病年龄更早(<0.01);更频繁地被首次诊断为非心境障碍(<0.01);未治疗疾病的时间更短(<0.01);更频繁地表现为轻躁狂/躁狂为主的极性(<0.01)和以躁狂-抑郁为主的循环类型(<0.01);一生中的抑郁发作次数较少(<0.01),但躁狂发作次数较多(<0.01);且自知力较低(<0.01),过去一年的住院次数较多(<0.01)。多变量回归分析显示,有精神病性症状的双相障碍患者较无精神病性症状的双相障碍患者更频繁地被首次诊断为非双相障碍(比值比=0.64,95%置信区间=0.46-0.90,=0.02)或重度抑郁障碍(比值比=0.66,95%置信区间=0.48-0.91,=0.02),更频繁地表现为轻躁狂/躁狂为主的极性(比值比=1.84,95%置信区间=1.14-2.98,<0.01),且一生中的躁狂发作次数更多(多于六次)(比值比=8.79,95%置信区间=5.93-13.05,<0.01)。
双相障碍患者的一生中出现精神病性症状与不良的社会人口统计学和临床特征有关,也与更频繁的初始误诊有关。