• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对机械通气危重症患者靶向氧疗的可行性随机对照试验方案。

Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

机构信息

Critical Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e021674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021674.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021674
PMID:30659035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6340470/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oxygen is the most commonly administered drug to mechanically ventilated critically ill adults, yet little is known about the optimum oxygen saturation (SpO) target for these patients; the current standard of care is an SpO of 96% or above. Small pilot studies have demonstrated that permissive hypoxaemia (aiming for a lower SpO than normal by using a lower fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FIO)) can be achieved in the critically ill and appears to be safe. This approach has not been evaluated in a National Health Service setting. It is possible that permissive hypoxaemia may be beneficial to critically ill patients thus it requires robust evaluation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Targeted OXygen therapY in Critical illness (TOXYC) is a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether recruiting patients to a study of permissive hypoxaemia is possible in the UK. It will also investigate biological mechanisms that may underlie the links between oxygenation and patient outcomes. Mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure will be recruited from critical care units at two sites and randomised (1:1 ratio) to an SpO target of either 88%-92% or ≥96% while intubated with an endotracheal tube. Clinical teams can adjust FIO and ventilator settings as they wish to achieve these targets. Clinical information will be collected before, during and after the intervention and blood samples taken to measure markers of systemic oxidative stress. The primary outcome of this study is feasibility, which will be assessed by recruitment rate, protocol adherence and withdrawal rates. Secondary outcomes will include a comparison of standard critical care outcome measures between the two intervention groups, and the measurement of biomarkers of systemic oxidative stress. The results will be used to calculate a sample size, likely number of sites and overall length of time required for a subsequent large multicentre RCT.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the London - Harrow Research Ethics Committee on 2 November 2017 (REC Reference 17/LO/1334) and received HRA approval on 13 November 2017. Results from this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at medical and scientific meetings, in the NIHR Journals Library and patient information websites.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03287466; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

氧气是机械通气危重症成人最常用的药物,但人们对这些患者的最佳血氧饱和度(SpO2)目标知之甚少;目前的治疗标准是 SpO2 达到 96%或以上。小型试点研究表明,在危重病患者中可以实现允许性低氧血症(通过使用较低的吸入氧分数(FIO)来达到低于正常的 SpO2),并且似乎是安全的。这种方法尚未在国民保健服务体系中进行评估。允许性低氧血症可能对危重病患者有益,因此需要进行强有力的评估。

方法和分析

Targeted OXygen therapY in Critical illness(TOXYC)是一项可行性随机对照试验(RCT),旨在评估在英国招募患者参加允许性低氧血症研究是否可行。它还将研究可能存在于氧合与患者结局之间联系的生物学机制。呼吸衰竭的机械通气患者将从两个地点的重症监护病房招募,并随机(1:1 比例)分为 SpO2 目标为 88%-92%或≥96%,同时通过气管内插管进行插管。临床团队可以根据需要调整 FIO 和呼吸机设置以达到这些目标。将在干预前后收集临床信息,并采集血液样本以测量全身氧化应激标志物。该研究的主要结果是可行性,将通过招募率、方案依从性和退出率进行评估。次要结果将包括比较两组干预措施之间的标准重症监护结局测量值,以及测量全身氧化应激的生物标志物。结果将用于计算样本量、可能的站点数量和后续大规模多中心 RCT 所需的总时间。

伦理和传播

该研究于 2017 年 11 月 2 日获得伦敦-哈罗研究伦理委员会的批准(REC 参考 17/LO/1334),并于 2017 年 11 月 13 日获得 HRA 批准。该研究的结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,在医学和科学会议上,在 NIHR 期刊库和患者信息网站上。

试验注册号

NCT03287466;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/6340470/72c703e7a2d9/bmjopen-2018-021674f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/6340470/72c703e7a2d9/bmjopen-2018-021674f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/6340470/72c703e7a2d9/bmjopen-2018-021674f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.一项针对机械通气危重症患者靶向氧疗的可行性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e021674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021674.
2
Protocol for a randomised pilot multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in critically ill children (Oxy-PICU).一项随机对照多中心试验的研究方案,比较危重症儿童保守与宽松氧合目标(Oxy-PICU)。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e019253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019253.
3
Oxygen therapy in critical illness: precise control of arterial oxygenation and permissive hypoxemia.危重病患者的氧疗:精确控制动脉血氧和允许性低氧血症。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):423-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a44f6.
4
Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.机械通气的危重症患者采用允许性低氧血症与正常氧血症的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 7;2014(5):CD009931. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009931.pub2.
5
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
7
High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care: the FIRST-ABC RCTs.高流量鼻导管治疗与持续气道正压通气用于儿科重症监护中的无创呼吸支持:FIRST-ABC随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(9):1-96. doi: 10.3310/PDBG1495.
8
FIRST-line support for Assistance in Breathing in Children (FIRST-ABC): protocol for a multicentre randomised feasibility trial of non-invasive respiratory support in critically ill children.儿童呼吸支持一线援助(FIRST-ABC):危重症儿童无创呼吸支持多中心随机可行性试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 12;7(6):e016181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016181.
9
Safe, effective and cost-effective oxygen saturation targets for children and adolescents with respiratory distress: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (OxyKids study).针对有呼吸窘迫的儿童和青少年的安全、有效且具成本效益的血氧饱和度目标:一项随机对照试验的方案(OxyKids研究)
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e087891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087891.
10
Nebulised surfactant for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in adults (COV-Surf): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.雾化表面活性剂治疗成人重症新型冠状病毒肺炎(COV-Surf):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结
Trials. 2020 Dec 10;21(1):1014. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04944-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.一项针对机械通气重症患者的靶向氧疗可行性随机对照试验。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2021 Nov;22(4):280-287. doi: 10.1177/17511437211010031. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Impact of Permissive Hypoxia and Hyperoxia Avoidance on Clinical Outcomes in Septic Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.允许性低氧血症和避免高氧血症对机械通气脓毒症患者临床结局的影响:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 14;2021:7332027. doi: 10.1155/2021/7332027. eCollection 2021.
3
Hypoxemia During One-Lung Ventilation: Does It Really Matter?

本文引用的文献

1
Oxidative stress in critically ill ventilated adults: effects of vitamin D and associations with alveolar macrophage function.危重症机械通气成人的氧化应激:维生素 D 的作用及其与肺泡巨噬细胞功能的关系。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 May;72(5):744-751. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0047-0. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
2
Oxygen therapy and the Goldilocks principle.氧疗与“金发姑娘原则”。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2017 Nov;18(4):279-281. doi: 10.1177/1751143717712162. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
3
Research priorities by professional background - A detailed analysis of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.
单肺通气期间的低氧血症:真的重要吗?
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(4):414-420. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00470-5. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
按专业背景划分的研究重点——对詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目的详细分析
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 May;17(2):111-116. doi: 10.1177/1751143715609954. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Oxygen in the ICU: Too Much of a Good Thing?重症监护病房中的氧气:有益过头了?
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1553-1554. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13800.
5
Effect of Conservative vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: The Oxygen-ICU Randomized Clinical Trial.保守与常规吸氧治疗对重症监护病房患者死亡率的影响:氧气 ICU 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1583-1589. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11993.
6
Permissive hypoxemia/conservative oxygenation strategy: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde?允许性低氧血症/保守氧合策略:善还是恶?
J Thorac Dis. 2016 May;8(5):748-50. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.58.
7
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of a Two-Step Implementation of Conservative Oxygenation Targets in Critically Ill Patients: A Before and After Trial.重症患者保守氧合目标两步实施的有效性和临床结果:一项前后对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):554-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001461.
8
Conservative versus Liberal Oxygenation Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Patients. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.机械通气患者的保守与自由氧合目标:一项多中心随机对照试验的初步研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 1;193(1):43-51. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1019OC.
9
Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot before-and-after trial.机械通气患者的保守氧疗:一项前后对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1414-22. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000219.
10
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.