Louman Sam, van Stralen Karlijn J, Koppelman Gerard, Vaessen-Verberne Anja, Bekhof Jolita, Bosmans J, Brackel Caroline, Kamps Arvid W A, de Kleer Ismé, Balemans Walter, Scheffer Mirjam, Brouwer Marianne, van den Beukel Marije, Andrinopoulou Eleni-Rosalina, Pijnenburg Mariëlle W H, Boehmer Annemie L M
Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Department of Paediatrics/Division of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e087891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087891.
Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of oxygen saturation (SpO2) thresholds in children admitted with respiratory distress. The current 90%-94% threshold could lead to prolonged administration of supplemental oxygen, increased duration of hospital admissions, distress for children and families, and healthcare costs. To balance reducing unnecessary oxygen administration and preventing hypoxia, a lower SpO2 threshold of 88% for oxygen supplementation in children has been suggested. This trial aims to test the hypothesis that a lower SpO2 threshold of 88% safely reduces the length of hospital stay in children admitted with respiratory distress when compared with a 92% SpO2 threshold and to assess its cost-effectiveness.
This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms. A total of 560 children aged 6 weeks to 12 years admitted with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis, viral wheeze or lower respiratory tract infection will be recruited and equally randomised into an intervention or usual care arm. Intervention arm patients will receive supplemental oxygen if SpO2 falls below 88% or above 88% if deemed necessary by clinical staff. Control arm patients will receive supplemental oxygen if SpO2 falls below 92% or above 92% if deemed necessary by staff. The primary outcome is the time from admission to the time when all prespecified discharge criteria are met. Secondary outcomes are length of stay, safety (time to recovery, readmissions and paediatric intensive care admissions), quality of life, parental anxiety and societal costs. Patients are followed up by digital questionnaires up to 90 days postdischarge.
This study has received approval from the research ethics committee (REC) of Leiden, Den Haag and Delft (EU CT number 2023-504817-56). Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or guardians. Parents of patients and patient representatives are involved in all stages of the study, from design to results, interpretation and dissemination. The results of this trial will be disseminated via lay publications, peer-reviewed scientific journals and academic conferences.
NCT06016244.
对于因呼吸窘迫入院的儿童,氧饱和度(SpO2)阈值的有效性和安全性知之甚少。目前90%-94%的阈值可能导致补充氧气的时间延长、住院时间增加、儿童及其家庭的痛苦以及医疗成本上升。为了平衡减少不必要的氧气使用和预防缺氧,有人建议将儿童补充氧气的SpO2阈值降低至88%。本试验旨在检验这一假设:与92%的SpO2阈值相比,88%的较低SpO2阈值能安全地缩短因呼吸窘迫入院儿童的住院时间,并评估其成本效益。
这是一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,有两个平行组。总共将招募560名年龄在6周至12岁、诊断为细支气管炎、病毒性喘息或下呼吸道感染的儿童,并将他们平均随机分为干预组或常规护理组。干预组患者如果SpO2低于88%或临床工作人员认为必要时高于88%,将接受补充氧气。对照组患者如果SpO2低于92%或工作人员认为必要时高于92%,将接受补充氧气。主要结局是从入院到满足所有预先指定出院标准的时间。次要结局包括住院时间、安全性(恢复时间、再次入院和儿科重症监护病房入院情况)、生活质量、家长焦虑程度和社会成本。患者出院后90天内通过数字问卷进行随访。
本研究已获得莱顿、海牙和代尔夫特研究伦理委员会(REC)的批准(欧盟临床试验编号2023-504817-56)。将从父母或监护人处获得书面知情同意书。患者的父母和患者代表参与研究的所有阶段,从设计到结果、解释和传播。本试验的结果将通过通俗出版物、同行评审的科学期刊和学术会议进行传播。
NCT06016244。