Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide and Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic, 270 Wakefield Street, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2020;16(3):178-183. doi: 10.2174/1573397115666190119095311.
The carpus is a complicated and functionally challenged mechanical system, advancements in the understanding of which have been compromised by the recognition that there is no standard carpal mechanical system and no typical wrist. This paper covers components of a larger project that seeks to develop a kinetic model of wrist mechanics to allow reverse analysis of the specific biomechanical controls or rules of a specific patient's carpus. Those rules, unique to each patient, could be used to create a forward synthesis mathematical model to reproduce the individual's anatomical motion in a virtual environment.
Based on the previous observations, the carpus essentially moves with only two degrees of freedom-pitch (flexion/extension) and yaw (radial deviation/ulnar deviation)-while largely preventing roll (pronation/supination). The objective of this paper is, therefore, to present the background and justification to support the rules-based motion (RBM) concept, which states that the motion of a mechanical system, such as the wrist, is the net interplay of four rules: morphology, constraint, interaction, and load. The stable central column theory (SCCT) of wrist mechanics applies the concept of RBM to the carpus, and by using a reverse engineering computational analysis model, a consistent pattern of isometric constraints was identified, creating a "two-gear four-bar" linkage. This study assessed the motion of the carpus using a 3D (three-dimensional) dynamic visualization model. The hypothesis was that the pattern and direction of motion of the proximal row and the distal row with respect to the immediately cephalad carpal bones or radius would be similar in all directions of wrist motion. To identify the unique motion segments, 3D models were created from five normal wrists that underwent CT scanning in multiple positions of radial and ulnar deviation as well as flexion and extension. Each carpal row (proximal and distal) was animated in a virtual environment with the cephalad carpal bones or radius held immobile. The rotational axis and position of each bone and each row were then compared in sagittal (flexion-extension) and coronal (radial and ulnar deviation) motion.
The carpus appeared to have only two degrees of freedom, and yet was stable in those arcs with the loads applied proximally in the forearm. The proximal row moved in a singular arc, but with a varying extent during sagittal and coronal motion. The isometric constraints were consistent in both directions. The distal row moved on an axis formed by a pivot joint laterally (between the trapezium and scaphoid) and a saddle joint medially (between hamate and triquetrum). The sagittal and coronal alignment of this axis changed as the proximal row moved. This created a distinct pattern of row motion to achieve the various required positions of wrist function. On wrist radial deviation, the scaphoid (with the proximal row) was flexed and the distal row was extended, whereas, in wrist flexion, the scaphoid flexed (with the proximal row) and so did the distal row. The pattern was reversed in the opposite wrist movements. While the general direction of motion of each row was consistent, the extent was quite variable.
This review supports the SCCT of carpal mechanics and the carpus acting as a twogear four-bar linkage, as well as the concept of RBM as a means to understand the biomechanics of the wrist, and how this is translated into specific functional tasks. More sophisticated 3D modelling will be required to further understand the specifics of carpal motion; however, reverse engineering of the specific rules that define each individual wrist can also be applied to a mathematical model to provide a "what if" test of particular surgical interventions for a variety of wrist injuries. The use of quantitative 3D Computed Tomography Scan (CT) analysis, surgical planning and virtual surgical intervention allows potential surgical solutions to be applied to a computer model of an injured wrist to test the possible outcomes and prognosis of a proposed treatment.
腕骨是一个复杂且功能受限的机械系统,尽管人们已经认识到没有标准的腕骨机械系统和典型的手腕,但对其的理解仍受到阻碍。本文涵盖了一个更大项目的组成部分,该项目旨在开发手腕力学的运动模型,以允许对特定患者腕骨的特定生物力学控制或规则进行反向分析。这些规则对于每个患者都是独特的,可以用于创建正向综合数学模型,以在虚拟环境中再现个体的解剖运动。
基于之前的观察结果,腕骨基本上只有两个自由度——俯仰(屈伸)和偏航(桡侧偏斜/尺侧偏斜)——同时在很大程度上防止滚动(旋前/旋后)。本文的目的是提出基于规则的运动(RBM)概念的背景和依据,该概念指出,机械系统(如手腕)的运动是四个规则的净相互作用:形态、约束、相互作用和载荷。腕力学的稳定中央柱理论(SCCT)将 RBM 概念应用于腕骨,通过使用反向工程计算分析模型,确定了一致的等距约束模式,形成了“双齿轮四杆”连杆。本研究使用 3D(三维)动态可视化模型评估腕骨的运动。假设是,在所有手腕运动方向上,近排和远排相对于头侧腕骨或桡骨的运动模式和方向都相似。为了确定独特的运动节段,使用来自五个正常手腕的 3D 模型进行 CT 扫描,这些手腕在桡侧和尺侧偏斜以及屈伸的多个位置进行了扫描。每个腕骨排(近排和远排)在虚拟环境中与头侧腕骨或桡骨保持不动的情况下进行动画处理。然后在矢状(屈伸)和冠状(桡侧和尺侧偏斜)运动中比较每个骨骼和每个排的旋转轴和位置。
腕骨似乎只有两个自由度,但在前臂近端施加负载时在这些弧中保持稳定。近排沿单一弧移动,但在矢状和冠状运动中移动程度不同。等距约束在两个方向上都是一致的。远排沿横向(在舟骨和大多角骨之间)形成枢轴关节和内侧(在钩骨和三角骨之间)形成鞍形关节的轴移动。当近排移动时,这个轴的矢状和冠状对齐会发生变化。这创建了一个独特的排运动模式,以实现手腕功能的各种所需位置。在手腕桡侧偏斜时,舟骨(与近排一起)弯曲,远排伸展,而在手腕屈肌时,舟骨弯曲(与近排一起),远排也弯曲。在相反的手腕运动中,这种模式被反转。虽然每个排的一般运动方向是一致的,但程度变化很大。
本综述支持腕骨力学的 SCCT 和腕骨作为双齿轮四杆连杆的作用,以及 RBM 作为理解手腕生物力学以及如何将其转化为特定功能任务的概念。更复杂的 3D 建模将需要进一步了解腕骨运动的细节;然而,定义每个个体腕骨的特定规则的反向工程也可以应用于数学模型,以提供特定手术干预的“如果……会怎样”测试各种手腕损伤。定量 3D 计算机断层扫描(CT)分析、手术计划和虚拟手术干预的使用允许将潜在的手术解决方案应用于受伤手腕的计算机模型,以测试拟议治疗的可能结果和预后。