Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Center of Digital Dentistry & Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Int Endod J. 2019 Jun;52(6):887-898. doi: 10.1111/iej.13076. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
To investigate simultaneously the effect of voxel size and fracture width on the accuracy of detecting vertical root fractures (VRFs) in non-root filled teeth when using cone beam computed tomography.
Fifty-one of 161 extracted human permanent teeth (16 anterior teeth, 132 premolars and 13 mandibular molars) were selected randomly for VRF induction with two fracture widths. All teeth were scanned with four CBCT units at different voxel sizes provided by the units. Three observers classified the presence or absence of VRF using a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated. AUCs amongst voxel sizes and between the fracture widths were compared using the Z test. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was assessed using weighted Cohen kappa.
For the NewTom VGi and ProMax 3D Mid CBCT unit, no significant differences were found amongst voxel sizes for the AUCs, irrespective of the fracture width (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between images scanned with voxel size 250 and 160 μm (P = 0.02), and images scanned with voxel size 250 and 80 μm for AUCs in the narrow VRF group for the 3D Accuitomo 170 unit (P = 0.03). For i-CAT FLX, significant differences were found between the voxel protocols of 300 μm and of the other three voxel sizes for AUC, sensitivity and NPV (P < 0.05). Significant differences between the wide and the narrow VRF groups for AUCs were found for 3D Accuitomo 170 (P = 0.01) and ProMax 3D Mid (P < 0.01).
Cone beam computed tomography was accurate for detecting VRF in non-root filled teeth. Fracture width had an effect on the detection of VRF. The effect of the voxel size on the detection of VRF depended on the CBCT unit used.
研究在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描时,体素大小和骨折宽度对检测非根管充填牙齿中垂直根折(VRF)的准确性的影响。
从 161 颗拔出的人恒牙(16 颗前牙、132 颗前磨牙和 13 颗下颌磨牙)中随机选择 51 颗进行 VRF 诱导,分为两种骨折宽度。所有牙齿均由四个 CBCT 单位以不同的体素大小进行扫描。三位观察者使用 5 分制对 VRF 的存在与否进行分类。计算灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)。使用 Z 检验比较体素大小之间和骨折宽度之间的 AUC。使用加权 Cohen kappa 评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。
对于 NewTom VGi 和 ProMax 3D Mid CBCT 单元,无论骨折宽度如何,体素大小之间的 AUC 均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。对于 3D Accuitomo 170 单元的窄 VRF 组,体素大小为 250μm 和 160μm 之间(P = 0.02)以及体素大小为 250μm 和 80μm 之间的 AUC 存在显著差异。对于 i-CAT FLX,体素协议为 300μm 和其他三个体素大小之间的 AUC、灵敏度和 NPV 存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。对于 3D Accuitomo 170 单元和 ProMax 3D Mid 单元,宽 VRF 组和窄 VRF 组之间的 AUC 存在显著差异(P = 0.01 和 P < 0.01)。
锥形束计算机断层扫描对检测非根管充填牙齿中的 VRF 是准确的。骨折宽度对 VRF 的检测有影响。体素大小对 VRF 检测的影响取决于所使用的 CBCT 单元。