ELOHA (Equal Lifelong Oral Health for All) research group, Paediatric Dentistry, Oral Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Localities Ontologies Commons Integrated (LOCI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):1178. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04947-7.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of detecting vertical root fractures in Biodentine™-filled teeth using the Promax 3Dmax cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) unit compared to periapical radiographs. It tested hypotheses regarding CBCT's diagnostic superiority in non-root-filled and Biodentine™-root-filled maxillary central incisors and assessed the impact of smaller field of view and lower intensity settings on detection accuracy.
Extracted maxillary incisors were divided into groups based on fracture status and root filling material, then placed in a Thiel-embalmed skull to simulate clinical conditions. The teeth were imaged using periapical radiographs and the CBCT unit under different settings. Fracture thickness was measured with microcomputed tomography for accuracy benchmarking. Multiple observers assessed the images, and statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate diagnostic performance.
Intra-rater reliabilities of consensus scores ranged from good to very good. Specificities were generally higher than sensitivities across all imaging modalities, but sensitivities remained constantly low. None of the Area Under the Curve scores exceeded 0.6, indicating poor overall accuracy for all imaging modalities. Paired comparisons of the area differences under Receiver Operator Characteristic curves revealed no significant differences between the CBCT and periapical radiograph techniques for detecting vertical root fractures in either Biodentine™-filled or non-root-filled teeth.
There was no significant accuracy improvement of the current CBCT device (Promax 3Dmax, Planmeca, Finland) over periapical radiographs in detecting small vertical root fractures in both non-root-filled and Biodentine™-root-filled maxillary central incisors. A smaller field of view with lower intensity did not enhance detection accuracy. These results highlight the challenges in accurately detecting small VRFs, emphasizing the need for further research and technological advancements in this domain.
本研究旨在评估 Promax 3Dmax 锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)与根尖片相比,在检测 Biodentine™填充牙中的垂直根折方面的准确性。本研究检验了 CBCT 在未填充根和 Biodentine™填充上颌中切牙中的诊断优势假设,并评估了较小视野和较低强度设置对检测准确性的影响。
将提取的上颌中切牙根据骨折状态和根充材料分组,然后放置在 Thiel 包埋颅骨中模拟临床情况。使用根尖片和不同设置的 CBCT 对牙齿进行成像。使用微计算机断层扫描测量骨折厚度以进行准确性基准测试。多位观察者评估图像,并进行统计分析以评估诊断性能。
共识评分的内部观察者可靠性范围从良好到非常好。在所有成像方式中,特异性通常高于敏感性,但敏感性始终较低。所有成像方式的曲线下面积(AUC)得分均未超过 0.6,表明所有成像方式的总体准确性均较差。在接收者操作特性曲线下面积差异的配对比较中,CBCT 和根尖片技术在检测 Biodentine™填充或未填充牙齿中的垂直根折方面,均未显示出差异有统计学意义。
在检测上颌中切牙未填充根和 Biodentine™填充根中的小垂直根折方面,当前的 CBCT 设备(Promax 3Dmax,Planmeca,芬兰)并未比根尖片有明显的准确性提高。较小的视野和较低的强度并没有提高检测准确性。这些结果突出了准确检测小 VRF 的挑战,强调了在这一领域进一步研究和技术进步的必要性。