Section of Nephrology and Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Houston, TX, USA; Baylor College of Medicine, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, TX, USA; Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Section of Nephrology and Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
It is uncertain whether consolidation in health care markets affects the quality of care provided and health outcomes.
To examine whether changes in market competition resulting from acquisitions by two large national for-profit dialysis chains were associated with patient mortality.
We identified patients initiating in-center hemodialysis between 2001 and 2009 from a registry of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States. We considered two scenarios when evaluating consolidation from dialysis facility acquisitions: one in which we considered only those patients receiving dialysis in markets that became substantially more concentrated to have been affected by consolidation, and the other in which all patients living in hospital service areas where a facility was acquired were potentially affected. We used a difference-in-differences study design to examine the associations between market consolidation and changes in mortality rates.
When we considered the 12,065 patients living in areas that became substantially more consolidated to have been affected by consolidation, we found a nominally significant (8%; 95% confidence interval 0%-17%) increase in likelihood of death after consolidation. Nevertheless, when we considered all 186,158 patients living in areas where an acquisition occurred to have been affected by consolidation, there was no observable effect of market consolidation on mortality.
Decreased market competition may have led to increased mortality among a relatively small subset of patients initiating in-center hemodialysis in areas that became substantially more concentrated after two large dialysis acquisitions, but not for most of the patients living in affected areas.
目前尚不确定医疗保健市场的整合是否会影响所提供的医疗服务质量和健康结果。
研究两家大型全国性营利性透析连锁店的收购导致的市场竞争变化是否与患者死亡率相关。
我们从美国终末期肾病患者注册处确定了 2001 年至 2009 年间在中心进行血液透析的患者。在评估透析机构收购引起的整合时,我们考虑了两种情况:一种是仅考虑那些在市场上接受透析治疗的患者,这些市场的集中程度大大提高,认为这些患者受到了整合的影响;另一种是认为所有居住在购买透析机构的医院服务区的患者都可能受到影响。我们使用差异中的差异研究设计来检验市场整合与死亡率变化之间的关联。
当我们考虑到那些生活在市场整合程度大大提高的地区的 12065 名患者受到整合影响时,我们发现整合后死亡的可能性增加了(名义上显著增加 8%,95%置信区间 0%-17%)。然而,当我们考虑到所有生活在收购发生地区的 186158 名患者都受到整合影响时,市场整合对死亡率没有观察到影响。
市场竞争的减少可能导致在两个大型透析收购后市场集中程度大大提高的地区,相对较小一部分开始接受中心血液透析的患者的死亡率增加,但对于大多数生活在受影响地区的患者没有影响。