Peralta Santiago, Carney Patrick C
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
J Feline Med Surg. 2019 Dec;21(12):1165-1171. doi: 10.1177/1098612X18823584. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
The aim of this study was to determine whether feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS) is more prevalent in shared vs single-cat households, whether the number of cohabiting cats or outdoor access represent risk factors for FCGS and whether the number of cohabiting cats is a useful prognostic indicator for standard surgical treatment.
Cats diagnosed with FCGS (study group) in the past 5 years at a referral institution were identified. The number of cohabiting cats, outdoor access, number of other cohabiting cats diagnosed with FCGS, ⩾6 month surgical outcome, when applicable, and historical signs of upper respiratory disease among any of the cohabiting cats, as well as patient demographic information, were recorded. Data were collected from medical records and by means of a telephone interview with the owners. The same information was collected from a group of cats of similar demographic characteristics diagnosed with periodontal disease but free of FCGS (control group).
Seventy-six cats were included, of which 36 (47%) had FCGS and 40 (53%) served as controls. Bivariate analysis showed that cats with FCGS were significantly more likely to come from shared households, and had significantly more total cats per household compared with controls. Multivariate analysis also showed that cats in shared households had a significantly increased odds of FCGS compared with those from single-cat households. Historical signs of upper respiratory disease and outdoor access among cats within the same household were not associated with FCGS. The number of cohabiting cats was not associated with surgical outcome.
Cats with FCGS are more likely to live in shared households. The risk of FCGS correlates with the number of cohabiting cats. The epidemiological features of FCGS may support an infectious etiology. The number of cohabiting cats within a household is not a useful prognostic indicator for standard surgical treatment of FCGS.
本研究旨在确定猫慢性龈口炎(FCGS)在多猫共居家庭与单猫家庭中是否更普遍,共居猫的数量或户外活动机会是否为FCGS的风险因素,以及共居猫的数量是否是标准手术治疗的有用预后指标。
确定在过去5年中于一家转诊机构被诊断为FCGS的猫(研究组)。记录共居猫的数量、户外活动机会、被诊断为FCGS的其他共居猫的数量、适用时的⩾6个月手术结果,以及任何共居猫的上呼吸道疾病历史体征,以及患者人口统计学信息。数据从病历中收集,并通过与主人的电话访谈获取。从一组具有相似人口统计学特征、被诊断患有牙周病但无FCGS的猫(对照组)收集相同信息。
纳入76只猫,其中36只(47%)患有FCGS,40只(53%)作为对照。双变量分析显示,与对照组相比,患有FCGS的猫来自多猫共居家庭的可能性显著更高,且每户的猫总数显著更多。多变量分析还显示,与单猫家庭的猫相比,多猫共居家庭的猫患FCGS的几率显著增加。同一家庭内猫的上呼吸道疾病历史体征和户外活动机会与FCGS无关。共居猫的数量与手术结果无关。
患有FCGS的猫更有可能生活在多猫共居家庭中。FCGS的风险与共居猫的数量相关。FCGS的流行病学特征可能支持感染性病因。家庭中共居猫的数量不是FCGS标准手术治疗的有用预后指标。