From the Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Anesthesia, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
ASAIO J. 2019 Nov/Dec;65(8):819-826. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000908.
Effective strategies to optimize Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS 1) patients are in much need. A novel awake venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (aVA ECMO) allows for clinical assessments while temporarily supporting biventricular function and stabilizing end-organ functions. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of patients with aVA ECMO support before durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We evaluated 83 patients who received durable LVAD in 2012-2015, of whom 19 received aVA ECMO support before durable LVAD. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted to assess post-LVAD survival. No complications were observed during the mean aVA ECMO support of 2.7 days. Unadjusted survival of aVA ECMO-supported patients and non-aVA ECMO INTERMACS 1 patients at 1 year were 84.2% and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.15). Survival of aVA ECMO patients was comparable with that of non-aVA ECMO INTERMACS 2 cohort (84.2% vs. 80.8%) at 1 year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of death in aVA ECMO group compared with INTERMACS 1 non-aVA ECMO group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.17; p = 0.035). Awake venous-arterial (VA) ECMO allows bridge to next therapy and improves outcomes in INTERMACS category 1 patients with an effect comparable with downgrading the disease severity on the INTERMACS scale.
需要寻找优化机械循环辅助支持(INTERMACS)1 患者的有效策略。新型清醒动静脉体外膜肺氧合(aVA ECMO)可在临时支持双心室功能和稳定终末器官功能的同时进行临床评估。该研究的目的是评估在植入耐用性左心室辅助装置(LVAD)之前接受 aVA ECMO 支持的患者的结局。我们评估了 2012 年至 2015 年期间接受耐用性 LVAD 的 83 例患者,其中 19 例在植入耐用性 LVAD 前接受 aVA ECMO 支持。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险分析评估 LVAD 后生存率。在平均 2.7 天的 aVA ECMO 支持期间,未观察到任何并发症。未接受 aVA ECMO 支持的患者和接受 aVA ECMO 的 INTERMACS 1 患者的未调整生存率在 1 年时分别为 84.2%和 66.7%(p=0.15)。aVA ECMO 患者的 1 年生存率与非 aVA ECMO INTERMACS 2 队列相当(84.2% vs. 80.8%)。多变量分析表明,与 INTERMACS 1 非 aVA ECMO 组相比,aVA ECMO 组的死亡风险显著降低(风险比 [HR]:0.17;p=0.035)。清醒动静脉(VA)ECMO 可作为下一步治疗的桥梁,并改善 INTERMACS 1 类患者的结局,其效果可与降低 INTERMACS 评分的疾病严重程度相媲美。