Suppr超能文献

已取消或中止的 CT 引导介入治疗:三级保健中心 13 年的临床经验。

Canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions: 13-year clinical experience at a tertiary care center.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3372-3378. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5991-0. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and causes of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions (biopsies, cytological aspirations, hookwire localizations, and catheter drainages), associations with patient and procedural variables, and subsequent management.

METHODS

This study included 3052 consecutive CT-guided interventions (2487 biopsies, 80 cytological aspirations, 223 hookwire localizations, and 262 catheter drainages) performed in a single institution within a 13-year period.

RESULTS

Fifty-two of 3052 CT-guided interventions were canceled or aborted, corresponding to a frequency of 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.2%). Main causes in order of decreasing frequency included pain, lack of a safe window for intervention, impossibility to position the co-axial or biopsy needle in or near the target, inability to lie still, dyspnea and low oxygen saturation levels, non-discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, impossibility to aspirate fluid or pus when attempting drainage, and impossibility to advance the drainage catheter in a fluid collection or abscess. On multivariate analysis, only catheter drainages and head-neck interventions were significantly at risk (p = 0.019 and p = 0.004) to be canceled or aborted, with odds ratios of 2.677 (95% CI 1.178-6.083) and 6.956 (95% CI 1.883-25.691), respectively. Of 52 canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions, 14 (26.9%) were repeated, 19 (36.5%) underwent a different non-CT-guided interventional procedure on the same target, and 19 (36.5%) did not undergo any subsequent intervention.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions is low, but is not negligible. Awareness of causes and circumstances under which they are more likely to occur may reduce the number of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions.

KEY POINTS

• Approximately 1.7% of CT-guided interventions, for which the patient physically shows up at the CT room and which are considered useful by the radiologist, are eventually canceled or aborted. • Main causes (of which some may be prevented) are pain, lack of a safe window, impossibility to position the co-axial or biopsy needle, inability to lie still, dyspnea, non-discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, and impossibility to aspirate liquid or advance the catheter when attempting drainage. • CT-guided catheter drainages and head-neck interventions are particularly prone to being canceled or aborted.

摘要

目的

确定 CT 引导介入(活检、细胞学抽吸、钩丝定位和导管引流)中取消或中断的频率和原因,及其与患者和操作变量的关联,并确定后续管理。

方法

本研究纳入了 13 年内在一家机构进行的 3052 例连续 CT 引导介入(2487 例活检、80 例细胞学抽吸、223 例钩丝定位和 262 例导管引流)。

结果

3052 例 CT 引导介入中有 52 例被取消或中断,占 1.7%(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.3-2.2%)。按频率降序排列的主要原因包括疼痛、介入无安全窗口、同轴或活检针无法定位到或靠近目标、无法保持静止、呼吸困难和低氧饱和度、抗凝治疗未中断、尝试引流时无法抽吸液体或脓液、以及在液体积聚或脓肿中无法推进引流导管。多变量分析显示,仅导管引流和头颈部介入显著有被取消或中断的风险(p=0.019 和 p=0.004),其比值比分别为 2.677(95%CI 1.178-6.083)和 6.956(95%CI 1.883-25.691)。在 52 例取消或中断的 CT 引导介入中,14 例(26.9%)被重复,19 例(36.5%)在同一目标上进行了不同的非 CT 引导介入操作,19 例(36.5%)未进行任何后续介入。

结论

取消或中断的 CT 引导介入的频率虽然较低,但不容忽视。了解更有可能发生的原因和情况,可能会减少取消或中断的 CT 引导介入数量。

关键点

  1. 约有 1.7%的 CT 引导介入,患者实际上已到达 CT 室,且放射科医生认为这些介入有用,但最终被取消或中断。

  2. 主要原因(其中一些原因可预防)包括疼痛、缺乏安全窗口、同轴或活检针无法定位、无法保持静止、呼吸困难、抗凝治疗未中断、尝试引流时无法抽吸液体或推进导管。

  3. CT 引导的导管引流和头颈部介入尤其容易被取消或中断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验