• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟质子和碳离子诱导的DNA损伤的双链断裂修复动力学

MODELLING DSB REPAIR KINETICS FOR DNA DAMAGE INDUCED BY PROTON AND CARBON IONS.

作者信息

Taleei Reza

机构信息

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

出版信息

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019 May 1;183(1-2):75-78. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncy304.

DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncy304
PMID:30668809
Abstract

Proton and carbon therapy are the main choices of particle therapy for cancer treatment. Particle dose distribution is superior to conventional photon therapy dose distribution due to Bragg peak. However, the basic biology of cellular damage and cell death is not well understood. The aim of this work is to present a mechanistic model of double strand break (DSB) repair that predicts the repair kinetics of damage induced by particles employed in cancer therapy. Monte Carlo Track Damage Simulation (MCDS) was employed to model DNA damage. The frequency of DSB and SSB was computed for proton and carbon ions. DSBs were subjected to repair model to calculate the repair kinetics. Two distinct DSB repair models dependent on the cell cycle were proposed. The DSB repair model contains non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR) and back up non-homologous end joining (B-NHEJ) repair processes. The DSB complexity results in the switch in the repair pathway from NHEJ to a slower process that starts with DSB end resection. DSB end resection in early S and G1 phases of the cell cycle enhances the B-NHEJ repair pathway, while in late S and G2 phases of the cell cycle promotes HR repair pathway. The repair model was transformed to a set of nonlinear differential equations. The model calculates the overall repair kinetics and protein temporal repair activity at the site of damage. The damage and repair model provides a detailed mechanistic understanding of all processes that are involved in the damage induction and repair. The number of DSB and their complexity increase as the particle energy decreases due to the proximity of particle interactions in water. The repair kinetics show a biphasic behaviour that is due to the NHEJ fast repair of simple type DSB and HR slow repair of complex type DSB.

摘要

质子和碳离子疗法是癌症治疗中粒子疗法的主要选择。由于布拉格峰,粒子剂量分布优于传统光子疗法的剂量分布。然而,细胞损伤和细胞死亡的基本生物学机制尚未得到充分理解。这项工作的目的是提出一种双链断裂(DSB)修复的机制模型,该模型可预测癌症治疗中使用的粒子诱导损伤的修复动力学。采用蒙特卡罗径迹损伤模拟(MCDS)对DNA损伤进行建模。计算了质子和碳离子的DSB和SSB频率。将DSB应用于修复模型以计算修复动力学。提出了两种依赖于细胞周期的不同DSB修复模型。DSB修复模型包含非同源末端连接(NHEJ)、同源重组(HR)和备用非同源末端连接(B-NHEJ)修复过程。DSB的复杂性导致修复途径从NHEJ切换到以DSB末端切除开始的较慢过程。细胞周期早期S期和G1期的DSB末端切除增强了B-NHEJ修复途径,而细胞周期晚期S期和G2期则促进HR修复途径。将修复模型转化为一组非线性微分方程。该模型计算损伤部位的整体修复动力学和蛋白质的瞬时修复活性。损伤和修复模型提供了对损伤诱导和修复所涉及的所有过程的详细机制理解。由于水中粒子相互作用的接近性,随着粒子能量降低,DSB的数量及其复杂性增加。修复动力学表现出双相行为,这是由于简单类型DSB的NHEJ快速修复和复杂类型DSB的HR缓慢修复所致。

相似文献

1
MODELLING DSB REPAIR KINETICS FOR DNA DAMAGE INDUCED BY PROTON AND CARBON IONS.模拟质子和碳离子诱导的DNA损伤的双链断裂修复动力学
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019 May 1;183(1-2):75-78. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncy304.
2
A Stochastic Model of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair Throughout the Cell Cycle.细胞周期中 DNA 双链断裂修复的随机模型。
Bull Math Biol. 2020 Jan 14;82(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11538-019-00692-z.
3
DSB repair model for mammalian cells in early S and G1 phases of the cell cycle: application to damage induced by ionizing radiation of different quality.细胞周期早期S期和G1期哺乳动物细胞的双链断裂修复模型:应用于不同性质电离辐射诱导的损伤
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2015 Feb;779:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
The major DNA repair pathway after both proton and carbon-ion radiation is NHEJ, but the HR pathway is more relevant in carbon ions.在质子和碳离子辐射后,主要的 DNA 修复途径是 NHEJ,但 HR 途径在碳离子中更为相关。
Radiat Res. 2015 Mar;183(3):345-56. doi: 10.1667/RR13904.1. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
5
Biochemical DSB-repair model for mammalian cells in G1 and early S phases of the cell cycle.哺乳动物细胞在细胞周期 G1 期和早期 S 期的生化双链断裂修复模型。
Mutat Res. 2013 Aug 30;756(1-2):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
6
Radiation-induced DNA damage by proton, helium and carbon ions in human fibroblast cell: Geant4-DNA and MCDS-based study.基于Geant4-DNA和MCDS的人成纤维细胞中质子、氦离子和碳离子诱导的辐射DNA损伤研究。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024 Jun 28;10(4). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad57ce.
7
The non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) mathematical model for the repair of double-strand breaks: II. Application to damage induced by ultrasoft X rays and low-energy electrons.非同源末端连接(NHEJ)双链断裂修复的数学模型:II. 应用于超软 X 射线和低能电子诱导的损伤。
Radiat Res. 2013 May;179(5):540-8. doi: 10.1667/RR3124.1. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
8
Effects of radiation quality and oxygen on clustered DNA lesions and cell death.辐射质量和氧对聚集 DNA 损伤和细胞死亡的影响。
Radiat Res. 2011 Nov;176(5):587-602. doi: 10.1667/rr2663.1. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
9
Roles for 53BP1 in the repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks.53BP1 在修复辐射诱导的 DNA 双链断裂中的作用。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2020 Sep;93:102915. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102915.
10
Proton and light ion RBE for the induction of direct DNA double strand breaks.质子和轻离子诱导直接DNA双链断裂的相对生物学效应
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2131. doi: 10.1118/1.4944870.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcriptomic response of prostate cancer cells to carbon ion and photon irradiation with focus on androgen receptor and TP53 signaling.前列腺癌细胞对碳离子和光子照射的转录组反应,重点关注雄激素受体和 TP53 信号通路。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 2;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02480-z.
2
Clinical Progress in Proton Radiotherapy: Biological Unknowns.质子放疗的临床进展:生物学未知因素
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 3;13(4):604. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040604.
3
Comparative Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Paired Choroidal Melanoma Samples Obtained Before and After Proton Beam Irradiation by Transscleral Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Endoresection.
经巩膜细针穿刺活检和内切除获取的脉络膜黑色素瘤配对样本在质子束照射前后的比较细胞遗传学异常
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 14;11(8):1173. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081173.