Souza Júnior Jorge Mangabeira de, Kulchetscki Rodrigo Melo, Linhares Filho Jaime Paula Pessoa, Lima Eduardo Gomes, Serrano Junior Carlos Vicente
. Cardiology Residents of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
. Department of Atherosclerosis, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018 Sep;64(9):783-786. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.09.783.
The treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction concomitant with the presence of multivessel disease has been studied in several recent studies with the purpose of defining the need, as well as the best moment to approach residual lesions. However, such studies included only stable patients. The best therapeutic approach to cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndrome, however, remains controversial, but there are recommendations from specialists for revascularization that include non-event related injuries. Recently published, the CULPRIT-SHOCK study showed benefit of the initial approach only of the injury blamed for the acute event, in view of the multivessel percutaneous intervention, in the context of cardiogenic shock. In this perspective, the authors discuss the work in question, regarding methodological questions, limitations and clinical applicability.
近期的多项研究对伴有多支血管病变的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗进行了探讨,目的是明确处理残余病变的必要性及最佳时机。然而,这些研究仅纳入了病情稳定的患者。然而,对于急性冠状动脉综合征继发的心源性休克,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议,但专家们对于包括非事件相关损伤在内的血运重建有相关建议。最近发表的CULPRIT-SHOCK研究表明,在心源性休克的背景下,鉴于多支血管经皮介入治疗,初始仅处理导致急性事件的损伤是有益的。从这一角度出发,作者讨论了该研究在方法学问题、局限性及临床适用性方面的相关工作。