United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service (USDA-ARS), Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Washington State University Whatcom County Extension, Bellingham 98225.
Plant Dis. 2018 May;102(5):938-947. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-17-1293-RE. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
Sixty percent of the $109 million processed red raspberry industry of the United States occurs in northern Washington State. In 2012, late-summer symptoms of vascular wilt and root disease were observed in many raspberry plantings. These symptoms were initially attributed to Verticillium dahliae. However, diagnostic tests for the pathogen were often contradictory and other soilborne pathogens (Phytophthora rubi and Pratylenchus penetrans) or Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) might also have been involved. Therefore, a survey was conducted in 2013 and 2014 to (i) establish the incidence and soil population levels of V. dahliae in red raspberry production fields, (ii) compare among diagnostic methods and laboratories for detecting and quantifying V. dahliae from raspberry field soil, and (iii) assess which pathogens are associated with late-summer disease symptoms of raspberry. Plant and soil samples were collected from 51 disease sites and 20 healthy sites located in 24 production fields. Samples were analyzed for the presence and quantity of each pathogen using traditional plating and extraction methods (V. dahliae, P. rubi, and P. penetrans), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (V. dahliae and P. rubi), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (RBDV). Results showed that V. dahliae was present in 88% of the production fields and that detection of the pathogen differed by method and by laboratory: qPCR detected V. dahliae in the soil from approximately three times as many sites (51 of 71 total sites) as by plating on NP10 semi-selective medium (15 of 71 total sites). Soil populations of V. dahliae were slightly greater at disease sites, but the pathogen was detected with similar frequency from healthy sites and it was rarely isolated from diseased plants (4%). P. rubi, P. penetrans, and RBDV were also common in production fields (79, 91, and 53% of fields, respectively). Both P. rubi (soil and root samples) and P. penetrans (root populations only), but not RBDV, were more frequently found at disease sites than healthy sites, and the amount of P. rubi detected by qPCR was greater from disease sites than healthy sites. In addition, P. rubi was isolated from 27% of the symptomatic plants located at disease sites. Regardless of detection method, V. dahliae, P. rubi, and P. penetrans, either with or without RBDV, were more likely to co-occur at disease sites (73%) than healthy sites (35%), suggesting that a soilborne disease complex is present in raspberry production fields. Results indicate that P. rubi is the primary pathogen most strongly associated with late-summer symptoms of disease, but root populations of P. penetrans and higher soil populations of V. dahliae may also be of concern. Therefore, disease control methods should focus on all three soilborne pathogens.
美国价值 1.09 亿美元的红树莓加工产业有 60% 集中在华盛顿州北部。2012 年,许多覆盆子种植园出现了夏季后期的萎蔫和根病症状。这些症状最初归因于尖孢镰刀菌。然而,针对病原体的诊断测试通常存在矛盾,其他土传病原体(腐霉和短体线虫)或覆盆子丛枝矮化病毒(RBDV)也可能参与其中。因此,2013 年和 2014 年进行了一项调查:(i)确定红树莓生产田尖孢镰刀菌的发病率和土壤种群水平;(ii)比较不同诊断方法和实验室检测和定量从覆盆子田间土壤中分离出的尖孢镰刀菌的方法;(iii)评估哪些病原体与覆盆子夏季后期疾病症状有关。从 24 个生产田中 51 个疾病地点和 20 个健康地点采集了植物和土壤样本。使用传统的平板和提取方法(尖孢镰刀菌、腐霉和短体线虫)、定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)(尖孢镰刀菌和腐霉)和酶联免疫吸附测定法(RBDV)分析样本中每个病原体的存在和数量。结果表明,88%的生产田都存在尖孢镰刀菌,并且病原体的检测方法和实验室不同:qPCR 检测到的土壤中尖孢镰刀菌数量约为 NP10 半选择性培养基平板检测到的数量的三倍(71 个总检测点中的 15 个)。病害部位的尖孢镰刀菌种群稍大,但在健康部位的检测频率相似,很少从患病植株中分离出(4%)。腐霉、短体线虫和 RBDV 也在生产田中很常见(分别为 79%、91%和 53%)。腐霉(土壤和根样本)和短体线虫(仅根种群),而不是 RBDV,在发病部位比健康部位更常见,qPCR 检测到的腐霉数量在发病部位比健康部位更高。此外,在位于发病部位的 27%有症状的植物中分离到了腐霉。无论检测方法如何,与健康部位相比,在发病部位更容易同时发现尖孢镰刀菌、腐霉和短体线虫(73%比 35%),这表明覆盆子生产田中存在一种土传病害复合体。结果表明,腐霉是与夏季后期疾病症状关系最密切的主要病原体,但短体线虫的根种群和较高的土壤尖孢镰刀菌种群也可能令人担忧。因此,疾病控制方法应集中于所有三种土传病原体。