Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States of America.
IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0211179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211179. eCollection 2019.
Blood tests for early detection of pregnancy in cattle based on pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) are commercially available. The objective of these studies were to compare the accuracy of blood tests to transrectal ultrasonography in detecting AI pregnancies, and to compare the accuracy of blood tests in predicting pregnancy loss. Beef cattle from 6 herds were synchronized using a recommended CIDR based protocol (Study 1: n = 460; Study 2: n = 472). Pregnancy status was determined by transrectal ultrasonography between days 28-40 following AI, blood samples were collected at this time. In study 2 a final pregnancy determination was performed at the end of the breeding season to determine pregnancy loss. Each serum sample was examined for PAG concentrations using a microtiter plate reader and/or scored by two technicians blind to pregnancy status and pregnancy loss. For study 1 Cohen's kappa statistics were calculated to assess the agreement between each test and transrectal ultrasonography. For study 2 data was analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with herd as a random effect, and loss, age, and their interaction included in the model. Agreement was good to very good for each test. There was no difference (P = 0.79) in sensitivity, but a difference (P<0.01) in specificity of the assays (88%, 64%, 87%, 90%) and in the overall percent correct (93%, 84%, 93%, 93%). There was an effect of pregnancy loss (P = 0.04), age (P = 0.0002), and their interaction (P = 0.06) on PAG concentrations. In conclusion both pregnancy tests were accurate at detecting AI pregnancies, and were in very good agreement with transrectal ultrasonography. Both tests detected differences in PAGs among females that maintained and lost pregnancy; however, prediction proved to be difficult as most females were above the threshold and would have been considered pregnant on the day of testing.
基于妊娠相关糖蛋白(PAG)的血液检测可用于早期检测牛的妊娠情况,这些检测方法已在商业上应用。本研究的目的是比较血液检测与直肠超声检查在检测人工授精妊娠中的准确性,并比较血液检测预测妊娠丢失的准确性。来自 6 个牛群的肉牛使用推荐的 CIDR 方案进行同期发情处理(研究 1:n = 460;研究 2:n = 472)。人工授精后第 28-40 天通过直肠超声检查确定妊娠状态,并在此时间采集血液样本。在研究 2 中,在配种季节结束时进行最终妊娠确定以确定妊娠丢失。使用微量板读数器检查每个血清样本中的 PAG 浓度,或由两名对妊娠状态和妊娠丢失均不知情的技术员进行评分。对于研究 1,计算 Cohen's kappa 统计量以评估每种检测方法与直肠超声检查的一致性。对于研究 2,使用 SAS 的 GLIMMIX 过程分析数据,将牛群作为随机效应,并在模型中包含损失、年龄及其相互作用。每种检测方法的一致性都很好到非常好。检测方法的敏感性没有差异(P = 0.79),但特异性(88%、64%、87%、90%)和总正确百分比(93%、84%、93%、93%)有差异。妊娠丢失(P = 0.04)、年龄(P = 0.0002)及其相互作用(P = 0.06)对 PAG 浓度有影响。总之,两种妊娠检测方法都能准确检测人工授精妊娠,与直肠超声检查非常一致。两种检测方法都能检测到维持妊娠和妊娠丢失的雌性动物之间的 PAG 差异;然而,预测证明是困难的,因为大多数雌性动物的 PAG 浓度都高于阈值,并且在测试当天会被认为是怀孕的。