• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Poor Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography to Detect Hip Chondral Delamination: A Retrospective Follow-Up of 227 FAI-Operated Patients.磁共振关节造影术检测髋关节软骨层裂的敏感性较差:227 例 FAIO 手术患者的回顾性随访。
Cartilage. 2021 Apr;12(2):162-168. doi: 10.1177/1947603518816453. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip.比较常规 3T 磁共振成像和 1.5T 磁共振关节造影在评估髋关节内部紊乱方面的可靠性和诊断性能。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):963-971. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5069-4. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement.非增强3特斯拉磁共振成像(3-T MRI)与1.5特斯拉磁共振关节造影(1.5-T MRA)在股骨髋臼撞击症中的诊断性能
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Mar;88:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.031. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
4
Diagnosis of lesions of the acetabular labrum, of the labral-chondral transition zone, and of the cartilage in femoroacetabular impingement: Correlation between direct magnetic resonance arthrography and hip arthroscopy.髋臼盂唇、盂唇 - 软骨过渡区及股骨髋臼撞击症中软骨病变的诊断:直接磁共振关节造影与髋关节镜检查的相关性
Radiologia. 2015 Mar-Apr;57(2):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2013.11.002. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
5
Acetabular labral tear description and measures of pincer and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and interobserver variability on 3 T MR arthrograms.髋臼盂唇撕裂的描述、钳夹型和凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击的测量以及3T MR关节造影的观察者间变异性
Clin Imaging. 2018 Jul-Aug;50:194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?哪些MRI结果可预测股骨髋臼撞击症手术后10年的失败情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1192-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5040-8.
7
Comparison of 3.0-T MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population.在同一患者群体中,比较3.0-T磁共振成像(MR)与3.0-T髋关节磁共振关节造影术用于检测髋臼盂唇撕裂和软骨损伤的情况。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Sep;88(1053):20140817. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140817. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
The validity and accuracy of MRI arthrogram in the assessment of painful articular disorders of the hip.磁共振关节造影在评估髋关节疼痛性关节疾病中的有效性和准确性。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Jan;28(1):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2022-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography to assess acetabular cartilage delamination.钆关节造影磁共振成像评估髋臼软骨分层。
Hip Int. 2009 Jan-Mar;19(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/112070000901900104.
10
Quantitative magnetic resonance arthrography in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.股骨髋臼撞击症患者的定量磁共振关节造影
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Dec;44(6):1539-1545. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25314. Epub 2016 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of pre-operative symptoms, radiographs, and MRI for the assessment of cartilage loss in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with intra-operative correlation.术前症状、X线片和MRI对股骨髋臼撞击综合征患者软骨损伤评估的可靠性及术中相关性研究
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s00256-025-04939-w.
2
Current understanding of articular cartilage lesions in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.当前对股骨髋臼撞击综合征中关节软骨损伤的认识。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 30;19(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05322-6.
3
Arthroscopic Repair of Acetabular Cartilage Delamination Using Chondral Nail Fixation in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜下使用软骨钉固定修复髋臼软骨分层治疗股骨髋臼撞击症患者
Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):102950. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.102950. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Comparison of MRI and arthroscopy findings for transitional zone cartilage damage in the acetabulum of the hip joint.髋关节髋臼过渡区软骨损伤的 MRI 和关节镜检查结果比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Jul;53(7):1303-1312. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04563-0. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
5
SSR white paper: guidelines for utilization and performance of direct MR arthrography.SSR 白皮书:直接磁共振关节造影的使用和性能指南。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Feb;53(2):209-244. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04420-6. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
6
Morphological assessment of cartilage and osteoarthritis in clinical practice and research: Intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed sequences and beyond.临床实践和研究中软骨和骨关节炎的形态学评估:中权重脂肪抑制序列及其他序列。
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(11):2185-2198. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04343-2. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acetabular Chondral Delamination in Femoroacetabular Impingement.磁共振成像在诊断股骨髋臼撞击综合征中髋臼软骨分层的准确性
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):23259671221119225. doi: 10.1177/23259671221119225. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
[Update on imaging in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome].[股骨髋臼撞击综合征的影像学进展]
Orthopade. 2022 Mar;51(3):176-186. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04223-y. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
9
Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.最佳实践:髋关节股骨髋臼撞击症。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Mar;216(3):585-598. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22783. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of magnetic resonance studies in the detection of chondral and labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement: systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振成像研究在检测股骨髋臼撞击综合征中软骨和盂唇损伤的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 16;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1443-2.
2
The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement.非增强3特斯拉磁共振成像(3-T MRI)与1.5特斯拉磁共振关节造影(1.5-T MRA)在股骨髋臼撞击症中的诊断性能
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Mar;88:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.031. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
3
Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: an epidemiologic and perioperative description of the first 2000 procedures.丹麦髋关节镜注册中心:对前2000例手术的流行病学及围手术期描述
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Feb 25;3(2):138-45. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw004. eCollection 2016 Jul.
4
Hip osteochondral lesions: arthroscopic evaluation.髋关节骨软骨损伤:关节镜评估
Hip Int. 2016 May 14;26 Suppl 1:17-22. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000406. Epub 2016 May 13.
5
Advanced Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current State and Future Prospects.髋臼股骨撞击症的先进成像技术:现状与未来展望
Front Surg. 2015 Jul 24;2:34. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.
6
MR findings associated with positive distraction of the hip joint achieved by axial traction.与通过轴向牵引实现髋关节阳性分离相关的磁共振成像(MR)表现。
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Jun;44(6):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2099-3. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
7
Diagnostic performance of direct traction MR arthrography of the hip: detection of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison.髋关节直接牵引磁共振关节造影的诊断性能:与关节镜检查对比检测软骨和盂唇病变
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):1721-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3534-x. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Evaluation of Labral Pathology and Hip Articular Cartilage in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI): Comparison of Multidetector CT Arthrography and MR Arthrography.股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)患者盂唇病理及髋关节软骨的评估:多层螺旋CT关节造影与磁共振关节造影的比较
Pol J Radiol. 2014 Oct 24;79:374-80. doi: 10.12659/PJR.890910. eCollection 2014.
9
Improving visualization of the central compartment of the hip with direct MR arthrography under axial leg traction: a feasibility study.轴向腿部牵引下直接磁共振关节造影改善髋关节中央腔可视化:一项可行性研究。
Acad Radiol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
10
A Swedish hip arthroscopy registry: demographics and development.瑞典髋关节镜手术登记处:人口统计学与发展情况
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):774-80. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2840-9. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

磁共振关节造影术检测髋关节软骨层裂的敏感性较差:227 例 FAIO 手术患者的回顾性随访。

Poor Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography to Detect Hip Chondral Delamination: A Retrospective Follow-Up of 227 FAI-Operated Patients.

机构信息

Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Cartilage. 2021 Apr;12(2):162-168. doi: 10.1177/1947603518816453. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1177/1947603518816453
PMID:30674199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970378/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency and characteristics of acetabular cartilage delamination (CD) in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients and to assess the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in detecting CD based on the radiologist report.

DESIGN

This is a single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients operated for symptomatic FAI. All of the patients had a 1.5-T MR-arthrogram within 12 months preoperatively. MRA reports of these patients were compared with operation notes and surgical videos of all patients by two trained assessors.

RESULTS

At surgery, CD of the acetabulum was present in 169 patients out of a total of 229 patients (74%). Only 6.5% (11 patients) of CD was described on the MRA reports preoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 37.6 ± 13.3 years. The average extent of delamination was 3.12 ± 1.5 cm with a mean coronal × sagittal extent of 0.68 × 4.33 cm. There was a significant difference regarding age ( = 0.002), alpha angle from frog view ( = 0.002), and alpha angle from anteroposterior view ( = 0.012) between the patients with delamination and without delamination. The majority of labral tears and cartilage damage were located in the anterosuperior quadrant. MRA sensitivity was 6%, specificity 98%, NPV 27%, and PPV 91% based on the radiologist report.

CONCLUSION

The CD in patients with FAI can be severely underdiagnosed with MRA. There is a need for better standard diagnostic criteria to detect CD in patients with FAI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性评估髋关节撞击综合征(FAI)患者中髋臼软骨分层(CD)的频率和特征,并基于放射科医生的报告评估磁共振关节造影术(MRA)检测 CD 的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。

设计

这是一项针对因症状性 FAI 接受手术的连续患者的单中心回顾性研究。所有患者均在术前 12 个月内行 1.5-T 磁共振关节造影术。两名经过培训的评估员比较了这些患者的 MRA 报告与所有患者的手术记录和手术视频。

结果

在手术中,229 例患者中有 169 例(74%)存在髋臼 CD。术前 MRA 报告中仅描述了 6.5%(11 例)的 CD。患者的平均年龄为 37.6±13.3 岁。分层的平均程度为 3.12±1.5cm,冠状×矢状位平均大小为 0.68×4.33cm。分层患者与无分层患者在年龄( = 0.002)、蛙位 α 角( = 0.002)和前后位 α 角( = 0.012)方面存在显著差异。大多数的盂唇撕裂和软骨损伤位于前上象限。基于放射科医生的报告,MRA 的敏感性为 6%,特异性为 98%,NPV 为 27%,PPV 为 91%。

结论

MRA 对 FAI 患者的 CD 可能严重漏诊。需要更好的标准诊断标准来检测 FAI 患者的 CD。