Ohkusa Yasushi, Sugawara Tamie, Taniguchi Kiyosu, Miyazaki Chiaki, Momoi Mariko Y, Okabe Nobuhiko
Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases.
National Hospital Organization Mie National Hospital.
Drug Discov Ther. 2018;12(6):381-383. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2018.01047.
The Fukushima research has examined data form a cohort study of 10,000 Japanese children under 18 years old with influenza during three months to demonstrate that the relative risk of A-type abnormal behavior of patients with oseltamivir was 30 times greater than without oseltamivir. By contrast, our research group found that patients who had been administered no neuraminidase inhibitors (NI) or those administered peramivir had higher risk of abnormal behavior than those administered oseltamivir, zanamivir, or laninamivir. A plausible explanation for this gap is that the two studies specifically examined different criteria to report abnormal behavior. In actually, some A-type abnormal behavior might not be life-threatening. Our definition of severe abnormal behavior is better matched to public health concerns and comparison among incidents according to the administered drug is more appropriate as an analytical procedure.
福岛的研究审查了一项队列研究的数据,该研究针对10000名18岁以下患流感的日本儿童,为期三个月,以证明服用奥司他韦的患者出现A型异常行为的相对风险比未服用奥司他韦的患者高30倍。相比之下,我们的研究小组发现,未服用神经氨酸酶抑制剂(NI)的患者或服用帕拉米韦的患者比服用奥司他韦、扎那米韦或拉尼米韦的患者出现异常行为的风险更高。对此差异的一个合理的解释是,这两项研究专门审查了报告异常行为的不同标准。实际上,一些A型异常行为可能不会危及生命。我们对严重异常行为的定义更符合公共卫生问题,并且作为一种分析程序,根据所服用药物对事件进行比较更为合适。