Suppr超能文献

非手术治疗子宫肌瘤:子宫和肌瘤体积减少的系统评价。

Nonresective treatments for uterine fibroids: a systematic review of uterine and fibroid volume reductions.

机构信息

a Department of Gynaecology , St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust , London , UK.

b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Inova Fairfax Hospital , Falls Church , VA , USA.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):295-301. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1564843. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

Abstract

Patients are increasingly seeking uterus-preserving, minimally invasive treatments for symptomatic uterine fibroids. This has led to a greater use of nonresective treatments such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), focused ultrasound (FUS) and more recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of fibroids. This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, examines the change in uterine and fibroid volumes associated with UAE, FUS, and RFA. Pubmed and MedlinePlus databases were searched from 1956 to 2016. The keywords used were 'radiofrequency ablation,' 'magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound,' 'ultrasound guided focused ultrasound', 'uterine artery embolization,' 'uterine fibroid embolization,' and 'leiomyoma' or 'fibroid'. Publications with at least 20 patients were included. Data were collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) software. Eighty-one relevant papers were identified: 52 related to UAE, 11 to RFA, 17 to FUS, 1 compared UAE and FUS. We report the published uterine volume and fibroid volume changes seen in these studies at 1 to 36 months. The pooled fibroid volume reductions at six months seen with RFA were 70%, UAE 54% and FUS 32%. All three types of nonresective treatment result in fibroid volume reduction. However, fibroid volume reduction is most marked with RFA, with UAE resulting in the next most volume reduction. Additional larger cohort studies, including those that are randomized and/or comparative, would enable definitive conclusions. This is the first systematic review comparing uterine and fibroid volume reduction after RFA, UAE and MRgFUS.

摘要

患者越来越多地寻求保留子宫、微创的治疗方法来治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤。这导致了非切除性治疗方法(如子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)、聚焦超声(FUS),以及最近的子宫肌瘤射频消融术(RFA))的使用增加。本系统评价遵循 PRISMA 指南,检查了 UAE、FUS 和 RFA 与子宫和肌瘤体积变化相关的变化。从 1956 年到 2016 年,在 Pubmed 和 MedlinePlus 数据库中进行了搜索。使用的关键词是“射频消融”、“磁共振引导聚焦超声”、“超声引导聚焦超声”、“子宫动脉栓塞术”、“子宫肌瘤栓塞术”和“leiomyoma”或“fibroid”。纳入了至少有 20 名患者的出版物。使用 Microsoft Excel(Microsoft Corporation,Redmond,WA)软件收集和分析数据。确定了 81 篇相关论文:52 篇与 UAE 相关,11 篇与 RFA 相关,17 篇与 FUS 相关,1 篇比较 UAE 和 FUS。我们报告了这些研究中在 1 至 36 个月内观察到的发表的子宫体积和肌瘤体积变化。RFA 治疗六个月时的肌瘤体积减少率为 70%,UAE 为 54%,FUS 为 32%。所有三种非切除性治疗方法均导致肌瘤体积减少。然而,RFA 导致的肌瘤体积减少最为显著,其次是 UAE。还需要更多的大型队列研究,包括随机和/或比较研究,才能得出明确的结论。这是第一次比较 RFA、UAE 和 MRgFUS 后子宫和肌瘤体积减少的系统评价。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验