• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍中的决策与风险:使用模糊痕迹理论的定量研究。

Decision-making and risk in bipolar disorder: A quantitative study using fuzzy trace theory.

机构信息

Lancaster University, UK.

Brain Dynamics, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Psychol Psychother. 2020 Mar;93(1):105-121. doi: 10.1111/papt.12215. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/papt.12215
PMID:30677209
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study characterizes risk-taking behaviours in a group of people with a self-reported diagnosis of BD using fuzzy trace theory (FTT). FTT hypothesizes that risk-taking is a 'reasoned' (but sometimes faulty) action, rather than an impulsive act associated with mood fluctuations.

DESIGN

We tested whether measures of FTT (verbatim and gist-based thinking) were predictive of risk-taking intentions in BD, after controlling for mood and impulsivity. We hypothesized that FTT scales would be significant predictors of risk-taking intentions even after accounting for mood and impulsivity.

METHODS

Fifty-eight participants with BD (age range 21-78, 68% female) completed a series of online questionnaires assessing risk intentions, mood, impulsivity, and FTT.

RESULTS

Fuzzy trace theory scales significantly predicted risk-taking intentions (medium effect sizes), after controlling for mood and impulsivity consistent with FTT (part range .26 to .49). Participants with BD did not show any statistically significant tendency towards verbatim-based thinking.

CONCLUSIONS

Fuzzy trace theory gist and verbatim representations were both independent predictors of risk-taking intentions, even after controlling for mood and impulsivity. The results offer an innovative conceptualization of the mechanisms behind risk-taking in BD.

PRACTITIONER POINTS

Risk-taking behaviour in bipolar disorder is not just a consequence of impulsivity. Measures of fuzzy trace theory help to understand risk-taking in bipolar disorder. FTT measures predict risk-taking intentions, after controlling for mood and impulsivity.

摘要

目的

本研究采用模糊痕迹理论(FTT)对一组自述患有 BD 的人群的冒险行为进行特征描述。FTT 假设冒险是一种“理性的”(但有时是错误的)行为,而不是与情绪波动相关的冲动行为。

设计

我们在控制情绪和冲动的情况下,测试了 FTT(逐字和主旨思维)测量是否能预测 BD 中的冒险意图。我们假设,即使考虑到情绪和冲动,FTT 量表仍将是冒险意图的重要预测因素。

方法

58 名患有 BD(年龄 21-78 岁,68%为女性)的参与者完成了一系列在线问卷,评估风险意图、情绪、冲动和 FTT。

结果

在控制情绪和冲动后,FTT 量表显著预测了冒险意图(中等效应大小),与 FTT 一致(部分范围.26 至.49)。BD 患者没有表现出任何基于逐字的思维的统计学显著倾向。

结论

即使在控制了情绪和冲动之后,模糊痕迹理论的主旨和逐字代表都是冒险意图的独立预测因素。结果提供了一种新颖的 BD 中冒险背后机制的概念化。

实践者要点

双相情感障碍中的冒险行为不仅仅是冲动的结果。模糊痕迹理论的测量有助于理解双相情感障碍中的冒险行为。在控制了情绪和冲动后,FTT 测量可以预测冒险意图。

相似文献

1
Decision-making and risk in bipolar disorder: A quantitative study using fuzzy trace theory.双相情感障碍中的决策与风险:使用模糊痕迹理论的定量研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2020 Mar;93(1):105-121. doi: 10.1111/papt.12215. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace theory for risk taking behaviors in bipolar disorder.双相障碍风险行为的模糊痕迹理论的相互作用和影响。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.035. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
3
Impulsivity, decision-making and risk-taking behaviour in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双相障碍中的冲动、决策和冒险行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2020 Oct;50(13):2141-2153. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003086. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Conceptualizing impulsivity and risk taking in bipolar disorder: importance of history of alcohol abuse.双相情感障碍中冲动性和冒险行为的概念化:酒精滥用史的重要性。
Bipolar Disord. 2009 Feb;11(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2008.00657.x.
5
Dysfunctional decision-making related to white matter alterations in bipolar I disorder.与双相I型障碍中白质改变相关的功能失调决策
J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
Are self-rated and behavioural measures of impulsivity in bipolar disorder mainly related to comorbid substance use problems?双相情感障碍中冲动性的自评和行为测量主要与共病物质使用问题有关吗?
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2017 Jul;22(4):298-314. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2017.1324951. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Increased reward-oriented impulsivity in older bipolar patients: A preliminary study.老年双相情感障碍患者奖励导向性冲动增加:一项初步研究。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 1;225:585-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.067. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review.运用模糊痕迹理论理解和改善健康判断、决策及行为:一项文献综述。
Health Psychol. 2016 Aug;35(8):781-792. doi: 10.1037/hea0000384.
9
Increased impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for bipolar disorder: evidence from self-report and experimental measures in two high-risk populations.冲动性增加作为双相情感障碍的一个易感性标志物:来自两个高危人群的自我报告和实验测量的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jun 1;178:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
10
Does a history of substance abuse and illness chronicity predict increased impulsivity in bipolar disorder?药物滥用史和疾病慢性病程能否预测双相情感障碍患者冲动性增加?
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 1;179:142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Natural Language Processing Methods to Build the Hypersexuality in Bipolar Reddit Corpus: Infodemiology Study of Reddit.使用自然语言处理方法构建双相情感障碍患者在Reddit上的性欲亢进语料库:Reddit的信息流行病学研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 6;5:e65632. doi: 10.2196/65632.
2
Investigation of genetic loci shared between bipolar disorder and risk-taking propensity: potential implications for pharmacological interventions.双相障碍与冒险倾向共享的遗传位点研究:对药物干预的潜在影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Aug;46(9):1680-1692. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01045-y. Epub 2021 May 25.