Suppr超能文献

儿童为不同权威和熟悉程度的成人观众画自画像的表现力。

Expressivity in children's drawings of themselves for adult audiences with varied authority and familiarity.

机构信息

University of Chichester, UK.

Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;37(3):354-368. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12278. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

Abstract

This study investigated whether children's expressive drawings of themselves vary as a function of audience authority and familiarity. One hundred and seventy-five children, 85 boys and 90 girls, aged between 8 years 1 months and 9 years 2 months (M = 8 years 5 months) were allocated into seven groups: a reference group (n = 25), where no audience was specified, and six audience groups (n = 25 per group) varying by audience type (policeman vs. teacher vs. man) and familiarity (familiar vs. unfamiliar). They drew baseline then happy and sad drawings of themselves, rated affect towards drawings type, and rated perceived audience authority. Audience familiarity and authority impacted expressive drawing strategy use and this varied by gender. There was higher overall expressive strategy use for happy drawings and for girls, and influences of affect type, familiarity, and authority were found. The implications of children's perceptions of audience type on their expressive drawings are discussed. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Children vary their happy and sad expressive drawings for familiar peer and adult audiences. They show more positive expressivity to familiar peer and adult audiences. Children perceive authority differently depending on professional roles. What does this study add? Children's expressive drawings differ depending on audience familiarity and professional role. Greater expressivity for familiar than unfamiliar audiences, with difference varying by perceived authority. For policemen, boys showed more sad expression when unfamiliar and girls showed more happy expression when familiar.

摘要

本研究调查了儿童自我表达性绘画是否会随观众权威和熟悉程度的变化而变化。175 名 8 岁 1 个月至 9 岁 2 个月(M=8 岁 5 个月)的儿童被分为七组:参考组(n=25),未指定观众,以及六个观众组(n=25 人/组),观众类型(警察与教师与男性)和熟悉程度(熟悉与不熟悉)各不相同。他们先画基线,然后画自己开心和悲伤的画,对画作类型的情感进行评分,并对感知到的观众权威进行评分。观众的熟悉度和权威影响了表达性绘画策略的使用,且这种影响因性别而异。对于快乐的画作和女孩来说,整体的表达策略使用更高,而且还发现了影响情感类型、熟悉度和权威的因素。讨论了儿童对观众类型的看法对其表达性绘画的影响。 关于这个主题,已经知道了什么? 儿童会根据熟悉的同龄人和成年人观众来改变他们快乐的和悲伤的表达性绘画。他们会对熟悉的同龄人和成年人观众表现出更积极的表现力。 儿童会根据职业角色对权威有不同的看法。 这项研究有何新发现? 儿童的表达性绘画取决于观众的熟悉程度和职业角色。相对于不熟悉的观众,熟悉的观众会有更多的表达性,而且这种差异取决于感知到的权威。对于警察,不熟悉时男孩会表现出更多的悲伤,而熟悉时女孩会表现出更多的快乐。

相似文献

1
Expressivity in children's drawings of themselves for adult audiences with varied authority and familiarity.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;37(3):354-368. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12278. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Impact of familiarity upon children's developing facial expression recognition.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;49(2):201-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01835.x. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
3
The role of audience familiarity and activity outcome in children's understanding of disclaimers.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Jun;37(2):230-246. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12269. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
[Expression of the emotions in the drawing of a man by the child from 5 to 11 years of age].
Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Jun;61(2):142-53. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007015.
5
Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity--sad faces are preferred only when familiar.
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):391-6. doi: 10.1037/a0030861. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
6
Children's understanding of facial expression of emotion: II. Drawing of emotion-faces.
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Jun;72(3 Pt 2):1228-30. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.3c.1228.
7
A happy story: Developmental changes in children's sensitivity to facial expressions of varying intensities.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Oct;107(2):67-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
9
Children's Recognition of Emotional Facial Expressions Through Photographs and Drawings.
J Genet Psychol. 2017 Mar-Apr;178(2):139-146. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2017.1286630. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Attachment security and attention to facial emotional expressions in preschoolers: An eye-tracking study.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;38(2):167-185. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12313. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of practical drawing skills and knowledge transferable skills of children based on STEAM education.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:1001521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001521. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptual Change in Science Is Facilitated Through Peer Collaboration for Boys but Not for Girls.
Child Dev. 2016 Jan-Feb;87(1):176-83. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12481. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
2
The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2000 Nov;1(2):27-66. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.002. Epub 2000 Nov 1.
3
Young children's beliefs about self-disclosure of performance failure and success.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;33(1):123-35. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12077. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
4
Drawing conclusions: The effect of instructions on children's confabulation and fantasy errors.
Memory. 2016;24(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.982656. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Drawing helps children to talk about their presenting problems during a mental health assessment.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;20(1):68-83. doi: 10.1177/1359104513496261. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
6
Expressive drawing ability in children with autism.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;31(Pt 1):143-9. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12008.
7
Symbolic use of size and color in freehand drawing of the tree: myth or reality?
J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):186-8. doi: 10.1080/00223890903510464.
8
The use of drawing for psychological assessment in Britain: survey findings.
Psychol Psychother. 2005 Jun;78(Pt 2):205-17. doi: 10.1348/147608305X26044.
9
Gender, gender relations, and the social dynamics of children's conversations.
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):64-74. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.64.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验