• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

价格管制是否会影响印度阿托伐他汀的销售?通过中断时间序列分析进行的影响评估。

Does price regulation affect atorvastatin sales in India? An impact assessment through interrupted time series analysis.

机构信息

Health Economics and Financing, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

Indian Institute of Public Health - Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024200.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024200
PMID:30679294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6347882/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of medicines price regulation (Drug Price Control Order, 2013) on the market share of atorvastatin in the Indian retail market for statins.

SETTING

All Indian states, January 2012 to December 2015.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental-interrupted time series analysis.

DATA

Pharmaceutical sales audit data set from IMS Health (now IQVIA) for the 48-month period from January 2012 to December 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Share of atorvastatin (in percentage) in the Indian market for statins in terms of sales volumes.

RESULTS

We observed that the price regulation notification (Drug Price Control Orders, 2013) was associated with 0.12% (p<0.001; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.18) increase in the trend of the average monthly market share of atorvastatin (5 mg and 10 mg). After 31 months of price ceilings notification, the average market share of atorvastatin was 3.41% higher than would have been expected had the price ceilings not been notified. In sensitivity analysis, with a control, our findings remain robust, we observed a 0.16% (p<0.001; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.24) rise in the trend of average monthly market share of atorvastatin (5 mg and 10 mg) as compared with the change in the control.

CONCLUSIONS

Price control as a public intervention did improve the relative sales of atorvastatin in the statin market in India.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察药品价格管制(2013 年药品价格管制令)对阿托伐他汀在印度零售他汀类药物市场份额的影响。

设置

所有印度邦,2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月。

设计

准实验中断时间序列分析。

数据

来自 IMS Health(现为 IQVIA)的 48 个月的药品销售审计数据集,时间范围为 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月。

结果测量

阿托伐他汀(按销售量计算)在印度他汀类药物市场的份额(以百分比表示)。

结果

我们观察到,价格管制通知(2013 年药品价格管制令)与阿托伐他汀的平均月度市场份额趋势增加了 0.12%(p<0.001;95%置信区间 0.06 至 0.18)。在价格上限通知后的 31 个月,阿托伐他汀的平均市场份额比没有通知价格上限时高出 3.41%。在敏感性分析中,在有对照的情况下,我们的发现仍然稳健,与对照相比,阿托伐他汀的平均月度市场份额趋势上升了 0.16%(p<0.001;95%置信区间 0.08 至 0.24)。

结论

作为一种公共干预措施的价格控制确实提高了阿托伐他汀在印度他汀类药物市场的相对销售。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71c/6347882/b64a48cd1b9f/bmjopen-2018-024200f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71c/6347882/f389e6cef76d/bmjopen-2018-024200f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71c/6347882/b64a48cd1b9f/bmjopen-2018-024200f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71c/6347882/f389e6cef76d/bmjopen-2018-024200f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71c/6347882/b64a48cd1b9f/bmjopen-2018-024200f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Does price regulation affect atorvastatin sales in India? An impact assessment through interrupted time series analysis.价格管制是否会影响印度阿托伐他汀的销售?通过中断时间序列分析进行的影响评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024200.
2
Evaluating the impact of price regulation (Drug Price Control Order 2013) on antibiotic sales in India: a quasi-experimental analysis, 2008-2018.评估价格管制(《2013年药品价格管制令》)对印度抗生素销售的影响:一项2008 - 2018年的准实验分析
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Oct 22;15(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00466-4.
3
Exploring the Evolution of Statin Pricing in Australia: Observations of Price Disclosure Effects on Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Expenditure.探索澳大利亚他汀类药物定价的演变:药品福利计划支出对价格披露效应的观察。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2024 Mar;40:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Do newly marketed generic medicines expand markets using descriptive time series analysis and mixed logit models? Korea as an exemplar and its implications.新上市的仿制药是否通过描述性时间序列分析和混合逻辑模型来拓展市场?以韩国为例及其启示。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 14;16:130. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1356-z.
5
Effect of Generic Competition on Atorvastatin Prescribing and Patients' Out-of-Pocket Spending.通用竞争对阿托伐他汀处方和患者自付费用的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1317-23. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3384.
6
Аn affordability of statins therapy - comparative analysis between Ukraine and Bulgaria.他汀类药物治疗的可负担性 - 乌克兰和保加利亚的比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4736-3.
7
Brazilian generics market change after Farmácia Popular program.巴西仿制药市场在“平价药品计划”实施后的变化。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Oct 17;53:94. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001237. eCollection 2019.
8
The impact of generic reference pricing interventions in the statin market.仿制药参考定价干预措施对他汀类药物市场的影响。
Health Policy. 2007 Nov;84(1):14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
9
The impact of a physician detailing and sampling program for generic atorvastatin: an interrupted time series analysis.医生推广和采样计划对通用阿托伐他汀的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 25;12(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0671-z.
10
Generic atorvastatin, the Belgian statin market and the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy.通用阿托伐他汀、比利时他汀类药物市场与他汀类药物治疗的成本效益。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2013 Feb;27(1):49-60. doi: 10.1007/s10557-012-6432-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of volume-based procurement policy on the usage and expenditure of first-generation targeted drugs for non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation in China: an interrupted time series study.基于量的采购政策对中国具有 EGFR 突变的非小细胞肺癌第一代靶向药物使用和支出的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):e064199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064199.
2
Impact of additional community services provision on dementia caregiver burden: an interrupted time-series analysis of 12-year interRAI assessments in Hong Kong.提供额外社区服务对痴呆症照顾者负担的影响:对香港 12 年 interRAI 评估的中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e057221. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057221.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mitigating regulatory impact: the case of partial price controls on metformin in India.减轻监管影响:印度二甲双胍部分价格管制的案例
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Mar 1;32(2):194-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw109.
2
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Evaluating the impact of price regulation (Drug Price Control Order 2013) on antibiotic sales in India: a quasi-experimental analysis, 2008-2018.
评估价格管制(《2013年药品价格管制令》)对印度抗生素销售的影响:一项2008 - 2018年的准实验分析
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Oct 22;15(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00466-4.
4
Impact of the Drug Prices Control Order (2013) on the Utilization of Anticancer Medicines in India: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.《2013年药品价格管制令》对印度抗癌药物使用情况的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
Cureus. 2022 Jun 27;14(6):e26367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26367. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
4
How the MDGs gave up on measuring access to medicines.千年发展目标是如何放弃衡量药品可及性的。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 May;4(5):e296-7. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)00066-8.
5
Availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines and their effect on use in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data.心血管疾病药物的可及性和可负担性及其对高收入、中等收入和低收入国家使用的影响:对 PURE 研究数据的分析。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):61-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00469-9. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
Effects of drug price reduction and prescribing restrictions on expenditures and utilisation of antihypertensive drugs in Korea.药品降价和处方限制对韩国抗高血压药物支出及使用的影响。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 15;5(7):e006940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006940.
7
Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis.在无法进行随机化时基于回归的准实验方法:中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2015 Jun 9;350:h2750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2750.
8
Interrupted time series analysis in drug utilization research is increasing: systematic review and recommendations.药物利用研究中中断时间序列分析的应用日益增多:系统评价与建议
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;68(8):950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
Moving to universal coverage? Trends in the burden of out-of-pocket payments for health care across social groups in India, 1999-2000 to 2011-12.迈向全民医保?1999 - 2000年至2011 - 12年印度不同社会群体医疗保健自费负担的趋势
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e105162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105162. eCollection 2014.
10
Despite increased use and sales of statins in India, per capita prescription rates remain far below high-income countries.尽管印度他汀类药物的使用和销售有所增加,但人均处方率仍远低于高收入国家。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):273-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0388.