Vogel P, Vogel D H V
Abt. Allgemein-Viszeral- und Minimalinvasive Chirurgie, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld, Seilerweg 29, 36251 Bad Hersfeld, Germany.
2Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Jan 23;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0184-6. eCollection 2019.
Cognitive errors have a considerable effect on procedural outcome. They play a major role in situational judgement and decision making, especially during cognitively demanding tasks. As such they need to be considered an important factor in medical and surgical procedures. However, whereas cognitive diagnostic errors are well known, as of yet the occurrence of errors due to cognitive heuristics may have been downplayed, underestimated, or simply been ignored during the course of surgical treatment.
All colorectal resections with anastomosis in 2015 and 2016 ( = 230) were prospectively screened for anastomotic failure ( = 17/230). During structured Morbidity and Mortality Conferences (MMC) all anastomotic failures were analyzed for both tactical and technical decisions in the pre- and intraoperative setting with potential meaning for the postoperative course, based on the London Protocol. In order to demonstrate the significance of cognitive errors in surgical procedures a structured interview with the individual surgeon was conducted including the video and photo documentation of the individual surgical procedure. The interviews were coded by independent coders who were instructed to identify defined cognitive errors. Inter-coder agreement was calculated using Krippendorff's alpha.
In 12/17 patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal surgery tactical or technical decisions with potential negative influence on anastomotic healing or the postoperative course were assessed during MMC. In 8/12 procedures a structured interview could be conducted with the operating surgeon. In 7/8 procedures cognitive errors could be identified. In particular we found Anchoring ( = 1), Availability Bias ( = 1), Commission Bias ( = 1), Overconfidence Bias ( = 1), Omission Bias ( = 2) and Sunk Costs ( = 1).
Cognitive errors seem to play an important role during surgical therapy of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. Consequently, we suggest cognitive errors should attract more interest in research as well as attention in clinical practice.
认知错误对手术结果有相当大的影响。它们在情境判断和决策中起主要作用,尤其是在认知要求较高的任务中。因此,它们需要被视为医疗和外科手术中的一个重要因素。然而,虽然认知诊断错误广为人知,但截至目前,在外科治疗过程中,认知启发式导致的错误可能被淡化、低估或干脆被忽视了。
对2015年和2016年所有行吻合术的结直肠癌切除术(n = 230)进行前瞻性筛查,以确定吻合口失败情况(n = 17/230)。在结构化的发病率和死亡率会议(MMC)期间,根据伦敦议定书,对所有吻合口失败病例在术前和术中的战术和技术决策进行分析,这些决策对术后病程可能具有潜在意义。为了证明认知错误在外科手术中的重要性,对每位外科医生进行了结构化访谈,包括对个体手术过程的视频和照片记录。访谈由独立编码员进行编码,他们被要求识别明确的认知错误。使用克里彭多夫阿尔法系数计算编码员间的一致性。
在17例结直肠癌手术后吻合口失败的患者中,12例在MMC期间评估了对吻合口愈合或术后病程有潜在负面影响的战术或技术决策。在12例手术中的8例中,对主刀医生进行了结构化访谈。在8例手术中的7例中发现了认知错误。具体来说,我们发现了锚定效应(n = 1)、可得性偏差(n = 1)、积极偏差(n = 1)、过度自信偏差(n = 1)、消极偏差(n = 2)和沉没成本(n = 1)。
认知错误似乎在结直肠癌切除术后吻合口失败患者的外科治疗中起重要作用。因此,我们建议认知错误应在研究中引起更多关注,并在临床实践中得到重视。