• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽最大努力的好人也可能会遇到问题:认识人为因素以及如何将错误降至最低。

Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimise error.

作者信息

Brennan Peter A, Mitchell David A, Holmes Simon, Plint Simon, Parry David

机构信息

Maxillofacial Unit, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.

Maxillofacial Unit, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;54(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.023
PMID:26542258
Abstract

Human error is as old as humanity itself and is an appreciable cause of mistakes by both organisations and people. Much of the work related to human factors in causing error has originated from aviation where mistakes can be catastrophic not only for those who contribute to the error, but for passengers as well. The role of human error in medical and surgical incidents, which are often multifactorial, is becoming better understood, and includes both organisational issues (by the employer) and potential human factors (at a personal level). Mistakes as a result of individual human factors and surgical teams should be better recognised and emphasised. Attitudes and acceptance of preoperative briefing has improved since the introduction of the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical checklist. However, this does not address limitations or other safety concerns that are related to performance, such as stress and fatigue, emotional state, hunger, awareness of what is going on situational awareness, and other factors that could potentially lead to error. Here we attempt to raise awareness of these human factors, and highlight how they can lead to error, and how they can be minimised in our day-to-day practice. Can hospitals move from being "high risk industries" to "high reliability organisations"?

摘要

人为失误与人类本身一样古老,是机构和个人犯错的一个重要原因。许多与导致失误的人为因素相关的研究都源于航空领域,在航空领域,失误不仅对造成失误的人,而且对乘客来说都可能是灾难性的。人为失误在医疗和外科事故中所起的作用正逐渐被人们所理解,这些事故往往是多因素导致的,包括机构问题(由雇主造成)和潜在的人为因素(个人层面)。个人因素和手术团队导致的失误应得到更好的认识和重视。自世界卫生组织(WHO)手术安全核对表推出以来,术前简报的态度和接受度有所改善。然而,这并未解决与手术表现相关的局限性或其他安全问题,如压力和疲劳、情绪状态、饥饿、对当前情况的认知(情境意识)以及其他可能导致失误的因素。在此,我们试图提高对这些人为因素的认识,强调它们如何导致失误,以及如何在日常实践中将其影响降至最低。医院能否从“高风险行业”转变为“高可靠性组织”?

相似文献

1
Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimise error.尽最大努力的好人也可能会遇到问题:认识人为因素以及如何将错误降至最低。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;54(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
2
Human factors--recognising and minimising errors in our day to day practice.人为因素——在日常实践中识别并尽量减少错误。
Oral Dis. 2016 Jan;22(1):19-22. doi: 10.1111/odi.12384. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
3
Leading article: What can we do to improve individual and team situational awareness to benefit patient safety?社论:我们能做些什么来提高个人和团队的情景意识以促进患者安全?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 May;58(4):404-408. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Review: Avoid, trap, and mitigate - an overview of threat and error management.综述:避免、陷阱与缓解——威胁与差错管理概述
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;58(2):146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Examining patient safety attitudes among urology trainees.调查泌尿科受训医师的患者安全态度。
BJU Int. 2014 Jan;113(1):167-75. doi: 10.1111/bju.12268.
6
A novel briefing checklist at shift handoff in an emergency department improves situational awareness and safety event identification.急诊科交接班时使用的一种新型简报清单可提高态势感知和安全事件识别能力。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Apr;31(4):231-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000194.
7
Surgical specimen handover from the operating theatre to laboratory-Can we improve patient safety by learning from aviation and other high-risk organisations?手术标本从手术室向实验室交接-我们能否通过向航空和其他高风险组织学习来提高患者安全性?
J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Feb;47(2):117-120. doi: 10.1111/jop.12614. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
8
Human factors application for healthcare teams in low- and medium-income countries (LMIC) to help improve patient safety and performance.在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的医疗团队中应用人为因素,以帮助提高患者安全和医疗表现。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Jan-Feb;12(1):77-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
9
Briefings: what can surgical and minimally invasive interventional teams learn from airline flight deck practice?简报:外科和微创介入团队能从航空公司驾驶舱操作中学到什么?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan;61(1):61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
Applying aviation factors to oral and maxillofacial surgery--the human element.将航空因素应用于口腔颌面外科——人为因素。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;51(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.024. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparisons between aviation and robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: lessons from safety practices in high-risk industries.妇科领域中航空手术与机器人辅助手术的比较:高风险行业安全实践的经验教训。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 8;19(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02440-z.
2
Human Factors: Do They Impact Surgical Performance?人为因素:它们会影响手术表现吗?
Cureus. 2024 Sep 16;16(9):e69507. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69507. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Senior surgeons as role models in the operating theatre: a thematic analysis through the lens of aristotelian ethics.
资深外科医生在手术室中的榜样作用:亚里士多德伦理学视角下的主题分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03921-7.
4
Associations Between Dietary Patterns and Sleep-Related Impairment in a Cohort of Community Physicians: A Cross-sectional Study.一组社区医生的饮食模式与睡眠相关障碍之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Sep 10;15(6):644-652. doi: 10.1177/1559827619871923. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
5
Self-reported surgeon health behaviours: A multicentre, cross-sectional exploration into the modifiable factors that impact surgical performance with the association of surgeons in training.自我报告的外科医生健康行为:一项多中心横断面研究,探讨影响手术表现的可改变因素以及与实习外科医生的关联。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 27;65:102299. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102299. eCollection 2021 May.
6
"Shh-don't say the Q-word" or do you?“嘘——别说那个 Q 字”或者你说了?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;59(1):e13-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.044. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
Compliance and perception about personal protective equipment among health care workers involved in the surgery of COVID-19 negative cancer patients during the pandemic.大流行期间参与 COVID-19 阴性癌症患者手术的医护人员对个人防护设备的依从性和认知。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;122(6):1013-1019. doi: 10.1002/jso.26151. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
8
Personal protective equipment and Covid 19- a risk to healthcare staff?个人防护装备与新冠病毒19——对医护人员的一种风险?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;58(5):500-502. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection.结直肠切除术后吻合口失败患者治疗过程中的认知错误。
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Jan 23;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0184-6. eCollection 2019.
10
How to create local safety standards for invasive procedures (LocSSIPs) by engaging the team in patient safety.如何通过让团队参与患者安全来制定侵入性操作的本地安全标准(LocSSIPs)。
Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.51.