United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, United States.
Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nutr Diabetes. 2019 Jan 9;9(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41387-018-0068-3.
Body mass index (BMI) represents a normalization of weight to height and is used to classify adiposity. While the capacity of BMI as an adiposity index has been experimentally validated in Caucasians, but there has been little testing Asian populations.
To determine whether weight scales to height squared in Asian Indians across the general population and in Asian Indian tribes an allometric analysis on the power law model, W = αH, where W is weight (kg) and H is height (m) was performed on cross-sectional weight and height data from India (N = 43,880) collected through the Anthropological Survey of India. The database contained males 18-84 years of age spanning 161 districts of 14 states and including 33 different tribes (N = 5,549). Models were developed that were unadjusted and adjusted for tribe membership. The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) was used to compare to height-weight data from the Anthropological Survey of India and to calculate BMI thresholds for obesity status using a receiver operating characteristic.
The unadjusted power was β = 2.08 (s = 0.02). The power for the general population (non-tribal) was β = 2.11 (s = 0.02). Powers when adjusted for tribe ranged from 1.87 to 2.35 with 24 of the 33 tribes resulting in statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in powers from the general population. The coefficients of the adjusted terms ranged from -0.22 to 0.26 and therefore the scaling exponent does not deviate far from 2. Thresholds for BMI classification of overweight in the KNHANES database were BMI = 21 kg/m (AUC = 0.89) for males 18 kg/m (AUC = 0.97) for females. Obesity classification was calculated as BMI = 26 kg/m (AUC = 0.81) and 23 kg/m (AUC = 0.83) for females.
Our study confirms that weight scales to height squared in Asian Indian males even after adjusting for tribe membership. We also demonstrate that optimal BMI thresholds are lower in a Korean population in comparison to currently used BMI thresholds. These results support the application of BMI in Asian populations with potentially lower thresholds.
体重指数 (BMI) 代表体重与身高的归一化,用于分类肥胖。虽然 BMI 作为肥胖指数的能力在白种人群体中已经通过实验验证,但在亚洲人群体中几乎没有经过测试。
为了确定 BMI 是否适用于整个亚洲印度人群体和亚洲印度部落,我们对幂律模型 W=αH 进行了跨性别分析,其中 W 是体重(kg),H 是身高(m)。我们对印度收集的横截面体重和身高数据进行了分析(N=43880),这些数据来自印度人类学调查。该数据库包含年龄在 18-84 岁之间的男性,涵盖了 14 个州的 161 个区,包括 33 个不同的部落(N=5549)。建立了未调整和调整部落成员身份的模型。使用韩国国家健康和营养检查调查 (KNHANES) 来比较印度人类学调查的身高体重数据,并使用接收者操作特征计算 BMI 肥胖状态的阈值。
未调整的幂为β=2.08(s=0.02)。普通人群(非部落)的幂为β=2.11(s=0.02)。当调整部落时,幂数范围为 1.87 至 2.35,其中 33 个部落中有 24 个部落的幂数与普通人群存在统计学上的显著差异(p<0.05)。调整项的系数范围为-0.22 至 0.26,因此标度指数与 2 相差不远。KNHANES 数据库中 BMI 分类超重的阈值为男性 BMI=21kg/m(AUC=0.89),女性 BMI=18kg/m(AUC=0.97)。肥胖分类计算为女性 BMI=26kg/m(AUC=0.81)和 BMI=23kg/m(AUC=0.83)。
我们的研究证实,即使在调整部落成员身份后,亚洲印度男性的体重仍与身高的平方成正比。我们还表明,与目前使用的 BMI 阈值相比,韩国人群的最佳 BMI 阈值较低。这些结果支持 BMI 在亚洲人群中的应用,可能需要更低的阈值。