• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类发育、哺乳动物形态和树木生长的多尺度异速生长。

Multi-scaling allometry in human development, mammalian morphology, and tree growth.

机构信息

Division of Biomechanics and Research Development, Department of Biomechanics, Center for Research in Human Movement Variability, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, 68182, USA.

Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 28;14(1):19957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69199-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-69199-5
PMID:39198500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11358500/
Abstract

Various animal and plant species exhibit allometric relationships among their respective traits, wherein one trait undergoes expansion as a power-law function of another due to constraints acting on growth processes. For instance, the acknowledged consensus posits that tree height scales with the two-thirds power of stem diameter. In the context of human development, it is posited that body weight scales with the second power of height. This prevalent allometric relationship derives its nomenclature from fitting two variables linearly within a logarithmic framework, thus giving rise to the term "power-law relationship." Here, we challenge the conventional assumption that a singular power-law equation adequately encapsulates the allometric relationship between any two traits. We strategically leverage quantile regression analysis to demonstrate that the scaling exponent characterizing this power-law relationship is contingent upon the centile within these traits' distributions. This observation fundamentally underscores the proposition that individuals occupying disparate segments of the distribution may employ distinct growth strategies, as indicated by distinct power-law exponents. We introduce the innovative concept of "multi-scale allometry" to encapsulate this newfound insight. Through a comprehensive reevaluation of (i) the height-weight relationship within a cohort comprising 7, 863, 520 Japanese children aged 5-17 years for which the age, sex, height, and weight were recorded as part of a national study, (ii) the stem-diameter-height and crown-radius-height relationships within an expansive sample of 498, 838 georeferenced and taxonomically standardized records of individual trees spanning diverse geographical locations, and (iii) the brain-size-body-size relationship within an extensive dataset encompassing 1, 552 mammalian species, we resolutely substantiate the viability of multi-scale allometric analysis. This empirical substantiation advocates a paradigm shift from uni-scaling to multi-scaling allometric modeling, thereby affording greater prominence to the inherent growth processes that underlie the morphological diversity evident throughout the living world.

摘要

各种动植物物种在其各自的特征之间表现出异速生长关系,其中一个特征由于生长过程中的限制而以幂律函数的形式扩展。例如,公认的共识是,树高与茎直径的三分之二次方成正比。在人类发展的背景下,有人认为体重与身高的二次方成正比。这种普遍的异速生长关系因其在对数框架内线性拟合两个变量而得名,因此产生了“幂律关系”一词。在这里,我们挑战了一个单一幂律方程足以描述任何两个特征之间异速生长关系的传统假设。我们巧妙地利用分位数回归分析来证明,描述这种幂律关系的标度指数取决于这些特征分布中的百分位数。这一观察结果从根本上强调了这样一个观点,即个体占据分布的不同部分可能采用不同的生长策略,这表现为不同的幂律指数。我们引入了“多尺度异速生长”的创新概念来封装这一新的发现。通过对(i)日本 5-17 岁儿童的身高-体重关系进行全面重新评估,该研究对 7863520 名儿童进行了研究,记录了他们的年龄、性别、身高和体重,这些数据是国家研究的一部分;(ii)一个包含 498838 个地理位置和分类标准化的个体树木记录的广泛样本的茎直径-高度和树冠半径-高度关系;以及(iii)一个包含 1552 种哺乳动物物种的广泛数据集的大脑大小-身体大小关系进行全面重新评估,我们坚决证实了多尺度异速生长分析的可行性。这种实证证实提倡从单尺度到多尺度异速生长建模的范式转变,从而更加突出了潜在的生长过程,这些过程是整个生命世界中明显的形态多样性的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/e76bb43684f5/41598_2024_69199_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/31ca229de7dd/41598_2024_69199_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/61a07861843c/41598_2024_69199_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/672faca28188/41598_2024_69199_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/d1847d1e4bb9/41598_2024_69199_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/1a0b67e49c4c/41598_2024_69199_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/acfdc6691760/41598_2024_69199_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/1b1bd1dff596/41598_2024_69199_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/ca2fb95b0127/41598_2024_69199_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/f2ee06d6ba1c/41598_2024_69199_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/89f2fd45c711/41598_2024_69199_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/56efe8b0ac30/41598_2024_69199_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/e76bb43684f5/41598_2024_69199_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/31ca229de7dd/41598_2024_69199_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/61a07861843c/41598_2024_69199_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/672faca28188/41598_2024_69199_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/d1847d1e4bb9/41598_2024_69199_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/1a0b67e49c4c/41598_2024_69199_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/acfdc6691760/41598_2024_69199_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/1b1bd1dff596/41598_2024_69199_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/ca2fb95b0127/41598_2024_69199_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/f2ee06d6ba1c/41598_2024_69199_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/89f2fd45c711/41598_2024_69199_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/56efe8b0ac30/41598_2024_69199_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43f2/11358500/e76bb43684f5/41598_2024_69199_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-scaling allometry in human development, mammalian morphology, and tree growth.人类发育、哺乳动物形态和树木生长的多尺度异速生长。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 28;14(1):19957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69199-5.
2
Allometric multi-scaling of weight-for-height relation in children and adolescents: Revisiting the theoretical basis of body mass index of thinness and obesity assessment.儿童和青少年身高体重比的异速多标度:重新审视消瘦和肥胖评估的体质指数的理论基础。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307238. eCollection 2024.
3
Dynamic allometric scaling of tree biomass and size.树木生物量和大小的动态异速生长。
Nat Plants. 2021 Jan;7(1):42-49. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00815-8. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Traditional allometric analysis fails to provide a valid predictive model for mammalian metabolic rates.传统的异速生长分析无法为哺乳动物的代谢率提供有效的预测模型。
J Exp Biol. 2008 Nov;211(Pt 22):3581-7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.023317.
5
Crown ratio influences allometric scaling in trees.树冠率影响树木的异速生长比例。
Ecology. 2006 Dec;87(12):2967-72. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2967:criasi]2.0.co;2.
6
Common allometric response of open-grown leader shoots to tree height in co-occurring deciduous broadleaved trees.伴生落叶阔叶树中,开张型优势顶梢对树高的常见异速生长响应。
Ann Bot. 2011 Nov;108(7):1279-86. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr228. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
7
Allometric convergence in savanna trees and implications for the use of plant scaling models in variable ecosystems.草原树木的异速收敛及其对可变生态系统中植物尺度模型应用的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058241. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Tree Morphologic Plasticity Explains Deviation from Metabolic Scaling Theory in Semi-Arid Conifer Forests, Southwestern USA.树木形态可塑性解释了美国西南部半干旱针叶林与代谢比例理论的偏差。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0157582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157582. eCollection 2016.
9
Unraveling power-law scaling through exponential cell division dynamics.通过指数细胞分裂动力学揭示幂律标度
Biosystems. 2024 Apr;238:105190. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2024.105190. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
10
Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory.树冠状结构的种内和种间变异比例的证据及其对异速生长理论的相关性。
Oecologia. 2012 Jul;169(3):637-49. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2240-5. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Allometric multi-scaling of weight-for-height relation in children and adolescents: Revisiting the theoretical basis of body mass index of thinness and obesity assessment.儿童和青少年身高体重比的异速多标度:重新审视消瘦和肥胖评估的体质指数的理论基础。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307238. eCollection 2024.
2
The Pace of Life: Metabolic Energy, Biological Time, and Life History.生活节奏:代谢能量、生物时间与生命历程
Integr Comp Biol. 2022 Jul 29. doi: 10.1093/icb/icac058.
3
Tallo: A global tree allometry and crown architecture database.
Tallo:一个全球树木测树学和树冠结构数据库。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Sep;28(17):5254-5268. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16302. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
4
Allometric rules for mammalian cortical layer 5 neuron biophysics.哺乳动物大脑皮层 5 层神经元生物物理学的异速生长法则。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7888):274-278. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04072-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
Drought-modulated allometric patterns of trees in semi-arid forests.半干旱森林中树木的干旱调节生长格局。
Commun Biol. 2020 Jul 30;3(1):405. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01144-4.
6
Novel anthropometric parameters to define obesity and obesity-related disease in adults: a systematic review.新型人体测量学参数在成人肥胖及肥胖相关疾病中的定义:系统综述。
Nutr Rev. 2020 Jun 1;78(6):498-513. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz078.
7
Rethinking the Effects of Body Size on the Study of Brain Size Evolution.重新思考体型对脑容量进化研究的影响。
Brain Behav Evol. 2019;93(4):182-195. doi: 10.1159/000501161. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Allometric scaling of weight to height and resulting body mass index thresholds in two Asian populations.两种亚洲人群中体重与身高的比例缩放和由此产生的身体质量指数阈值。
Nutr Diabetes. 2019 Jan 9;9(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41387-018-0068-3.
9
Breakdown of brain-body allometry and the encephalization of birds and mammals.脑体异速生长的解体和鸟类与哺乳动物的脑化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep;2(9):1492-1500. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0632-1. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
10
Equal fitness paradigm explained by a trade-off between generation time and energy production rate.用世代时间和能量产生率之间的权衡来解释适应度均等化模式。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb;2(2):262-268. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0430-1. Epub 2018 Jan 8.