Suppr超能文献

使用加压钢丝进行近节指间关节融合术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of the proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using a compression wire.

作者信息

Millrose Michael, Zach Alexander, Kim Simon, Güthoff Claas, Eisenschenk Andreas, Vonderlind Hans Christoph

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, Prof.-Küntscher-Straße 8, 82418, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany.

Department of Trauma Surgery, Helios Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Große Parower Straße 47-53, 18435, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Apr;139(4):577-581. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03119-5. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger is a common procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the primary stability of one, respectively, two compression wires to intraosseous wiring and tension band wiring for the arthrodesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stability of the arthrodesis was tested by applying flexion (n = 11) and extension (n = 10) force with 10° bending. Arthrodesis was achieved by one, respectively, two crossed compression wires and intraosseous wiring. In a control group (n = 11) tension band wiring was tested to 10° flexion and extension as well.

RESULTS

Mean values for flexion bending for intraosseous wiring were 10.94 N, for one compression wire 12.82 N, for tension band wiring 17.95 N, and for two crossed compression wires 20.42 N. Mean values for extension bending were 9.71 N for intraosseous wiring, 13.63 N for one compression wire, 21.43 N for tension band wiring and 22.56 N for two crossed compression wires.

CONCLUSION

The primary stability of the compression wires was statistically significant superior to intraosseous wiring. In comparison to tension band wiring which showed an intermediate stability. The application of a compression wire could be considered for further clinical testing in the arthrodesis of interphalangeal joints.

摘要

引言/目的:手指近端指间关节融合术是治疗骨关节炎的常见手术。本生物力学研究的目的是比较一根或两根加压钢丝与骨内钢丝和张力带钢丝在关节融合术中的初始稳定性。

材料与方法

通过施加10°弯曲的屈曲力(n = 11)和伸展力(n = 10)来测试关节融合术的稳定性。关节融合术分别通过一根或两根交叉加压钢丝以及骨内钢丝来实现。在对照组(n = 11)中,也对张力带钢丝进行了10°屈曲和伸展测试。

结果

骨内钢丝的屈曲弯曲平均值为10.94 N,一根加压钢丝为12.82 N,张力带钢丝为17.95 N,两根交叉加压钢丝为20.42 N。骨内钢丝的伸展弯曲平均值为9.71 N,一根加压钢丝为13.63 N,张力带钢丝为21.43 N,两根交叉加压钢丝为22.56 N。

结论

加压钢丝的初始稳定性在统计学上显著优于骨内钢丝。与显示中等稳定性的张力带钢丝相比,在指间关节融合术中可考虑应用加压钢丝进行进一步的临床试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验