Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Surgery. 2019 May;165(5):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.11.013. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
Large incisional hernias require medialization of the rectus abdominis muscles to facilitate tension-free closure. Medialization may be achieved by Rives-Stoppa, anterior component separation, or posterior component separation. This study aims to compare medialization achieved by these techniques in postmortem human specimens.
First, the Rives-Stoppa procedure was performed. Subsequently, anterior and posterior component separation were performed on one side in each specimen, with each specimen functioning as its own control. Medialization was measured at three levels of the linea alba with three 1-kg weights. Both medialization obtained in addition to initial medialization after opening the linea alba and total medialization were measured. Results are presented as median and interquartile range.
A total of 13 postmortem human specimens were included (Rives-Stoppa n = 13, component separation n = 10). Additional medialization after Rives-Stoppa was 1.2 cm (IQR: 0.3-2.2) for the anterior rectus sheath and 2.2 cm (IQR: 1.6-3.0) for the posterior rectus sheath (total medialization: 3.9 and 4.5 cm). For the anterior rectus sheath, additional medialization was 2.6 cm (IQR: 1.2-3.6) after anterior component separation and 1.9 cm (IQR: 0.4-3.4) after posterior component separation (P = .125, total medialization: 6.5 and 5.7 cm). For the posterior rectus sheath, additional medialization was 3.0 cm (IQR: 2.2-3.7) after anterior component separation and 5.2 cm (IQR: 4.2-5.9) after posterior component separation (P < .001, total medialization: 5.8 and 9.4 cm).
Posterior component separation yielded significantly more medialization of the posterior rectus sheath compared with Rives-Stoppa and anterior component separation. Anterior component separation may provide marginally more medialization of the anterior rectus sheath.
大切口疝需要对腹直肌进行内侧化以实现无张力关闭。内侧化可以通过 Rives-Stoppa 术、前侧分离或后侧分离来实现。本研究旨在比较这些技术在人体标本中的内侧化效果。
首先进行 Rives-Stoppa 手术。随后,在每个标本的一侧分别进行前侧和后侧分离,每个标本都作为自身对照。在白线的三个水平上用三个 1 公斤的重物测量内侧化程度。测量初始白线开放后的额外内侧化和总内侧化。结果以中位数和四分位距表示。
共纳入 13 例人体标本(Rives-Stoppa 组 n=13,分离组 n=10)。Rives-Stoppa 术后前侧腹直肌鞘的额外内侧化距离为 1.2cm(IQR:0.3-2.2),后侧腹直肌鞘为 2.2cm(IQR:1.6-3.0)(总内侧化距离为 3.9 和 4.5cm)。对于前侧腹直肌鞘,在前侧分离后额外的内侧化距离为 2.6cm(IQR:1.2-3.6),在后侧分离后为 1.9cm(IQR:0.4-3.4)(P=0.125,总内侧化距离为 6.5 和 5.7cm)。对于后侧腹直肌鞘,在前侧分离后额外的内侧化距离为 3.0cm(IQR:2.2-3.7),在后侧分离后为 5.2cm(IQR:4.2-5.9)(P<.001,总内侧化距离为 5.8 和 9.4cm)。
与 Rives-Stoppa 和前侧分离相比,后侧分离能更显著地实现后侧腹直肌鞘的内侧化。前侧分离可能会使前侧腹直肌鞘的内侧化程度略有增加。